Graduate studies at Western
Mind 70 (279):291-306 (1963)
|Abstract||In this article I try to refute the so-called "libertarian" theory of free will, and to examine how our conclusion ought to modify our common attitudes of praise and blame. In attacking the libertarian view, I shall try to show that it cannot be consistently stated. That is, my dscussion will be an "analytic-philosophic" one. I shall neglect what I think is in practice an equally powerful method of attack on the libertarian: a challenge to state his theory in such a way that it will fit in the modern biology and psychology, which are becoming increasingly physicalistic.|
|Keywords||libertarianism Mind argument blameworthiness|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael McKenna & Aron Vadakin (2008). George Sher,In Praise of Blame:In Praise of Blame. Ethics 118 (4):751-756.
Angela M. Smith (2008). Character, Blameworthiness, and Blame: Comments on George Sher's in Praise of Blame. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 137 (1):31 - 39.
Garrath Williams, Praise and Blame. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
J. J. C. Smart (1961). Free-Will, Praise and Blame. Mind 70 (279):291-306.
Manuel Vargas (2004). Libertarianism and Skepticism About Free Will: Some Arguments Against Both. Philosophical Topics 32 (1&2):403-26.
C. A. Campbell (1963). Professor Smart on Free-Will, Praise and Blame; a Reply. Mind 72 (287):400-405.
Nomy Arpaly & Timothy Schroeder (1999). Praise, Blame and the Whole Self. Philosophical Studies 93 (2):161-188.
Jason Turner (2009). The Incompatibility of Free Will and Naturalism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (4):565-587.
W. H. Halverson (1964). The Bogy of Chance: A Reply to Professor Smart's Free-Will, Praise and Blame. Mind 73 (October):567-570.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads129 ( #4,686 of 722,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #10,231 of 722,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?