Science, history and methodology
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):266-274 (1972)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJames Robert Brown (1980). History and the Norms of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:236 - 248.
Cassandra Pinnick & George Gale (2000). Philosophy of Science and History of Science: A Troubling Interaction. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31 (1):109-125.
Rein Vihalemm (ed.) (2001). Estonian Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
J. J. C. Smart (1972). Review: Science, History and Methodology. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):266 - 274.
Roger Ariew (1986). Descartes as Critic of Galileo's Scientific Methodology. Synthese 67 (1):77 - 90.
Azari͡a Prizenti Polikarov (1983). Methodological Problems of Science: The Iteration Cycle: Science--Methodology of Science. Pub. House of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #274,652 of 549,065 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
