Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (2):209-261 (2004)
|Abstract||Validity of dynamic temporal reasoning is semantically characterized for Englishand Dutch aspectual adverbs in Discourse Representation Theory. This dynamicperspective determines how the content needs to be revised and what informationis preserved across updates, when the order of premises is considered relevant.Resetting contextual parameters relies on modelling the basic aspectual polaritytransitions and temporal reasoning extensionally. For intensional aspectual adverbialsthe speaker''s attitudes regarding past alternatives to and possible continuations of thecurrent state come into play. Additional considerations are offered for generalizing thissystem to the full logical space for linguistic universals, lexicalized quite differently inDutch and English.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David R. Dowty (1986). The Effects of Aspectual Class on the Temporal Structure of Discourse: Semantics or Pragmatics? Linguistics and Philosophy 9 (1):37 - 61.
H. J. Verkuyl (1989). Aspectual Classes and Aspectual Composition. Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (1):39 - 94.
Satoshi Tojo (1999). Event, State, and Process in Arrow Logic. Minds and Machines 9 (1):81-103.
Alice G. B. ter Meulen (2003). Cognitive Modelling of Human Temporal Reasoning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):623-624.
Fabrizio Arosio (2010). Infectum and Perfectum. Two Faces of Tense Selection in Romance Languages. Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (3):171-214.
Maria Bittner (2008). Aspectual Universals of Temporal Anaphora. In Susan Rothstein (ed.), Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect. John Benjamins.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #71,101 of 549,084 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?