Anomalous monism and epiphenomenalism: A reply to Honderich
Analysis 44 (2):83-86 (1984)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Epiphenomenalism Metaphysics Monism Honderich, T | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesNeil Campbell (2005). Explanatory Epiphenomenalism. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (220):437-451.
Peter Smith (1982). Bad News for Anomalous Monism? Analysis 42 (October):220-4.
Heinz-Dieter Heckmann (1992). Mental Events Again--Or What is Wrong with Anomalous Monism? Erkenntnis 36 (3):345-373.
Stephen Law (2006). Honderich and the Curse of Epiphenomenalism. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (7-8):61-70.
Neil Campbell (1998). Anomalous Monism and the Charge of Epiphenomenalism. Dialectica 52 (1):23-39.
Ted Honderich (1982). The Argument for Anomalous Monism. Analysis 42 (January):59-64.
Ted Honderich (1983). Anomalous Monism: Reply to Smith. Analysis 43 (June):147-149.
Sophie Gibb (2006). Why Davidson is Not a Property Epiphenomenalist. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (3):407 – 422.
Norman P. Melchert (1986). What's Wrong with Anomalous Monism. Journal of Philosophy 83 (May):265-74.
Rex Welshon (1999). Anomalous Monism and Epiphenomenalism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):103-120.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads29 ( #42,467 of 551,007 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,450 of 551,007 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
