Aristotle, Menger, Mises: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Economics

Abstract There are, familiarly, a range of distinct and competing accounts of the methodological underpinnings of Menger' s work. These include Leibnizian, Kantian, Millian, and even Popperian readings; but they include also readings of an Aristotelian sort, and I have myself made a number of contributions in clarification and defence of the latter. Not only, I have argued, does the historical situation in which Menger found himself point to the inevitability of the Aristotelian reading; this reading fits also very naturally to the text of Menger's works.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Emma Tieffenbach (2010). Searle and Menger on Money. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (2):191-212.
    Jürgen Backhaus & Reginald Hansen (2000). Methodenstreit in der Nationalökonomie. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31 (2):307-336.
    Piet-Hein van Eeghen (1996). Towards a Methodology of Tendencies. Journal of Economic Methodology 3 (2):261-284.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-06-11

    Total downloads

    42 ( #27,042 of 549,090 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    20 ( #2,820 of 549,090 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums