Adorno vs. Levinas: Evaluating points of contention [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Continental Philosophy Review 40 (3):275-306 (2007)
Although Adorno and Levinas share many arguments, I attempt to sharpen and evaluate their disagreements. Both held extreme and seemingly opposite views of art, with Adorno arguing that art presents modernity’s highest order of truth and Levinas denouncing it as shameful idolatry. Considering this striking difference brings to light fundamental substantive and methodological incompatibilities between them. Levinas’ assertion of the transcendence of the face should be understood as the most telling point of departure between his and Adorno’s critiques of instrumental reason. I attempt to explain why Levinas believed this move was justifiable and how Adorno would understand Levinas’ notion of illeity as a cultural byproduct and a form of dogmatism. Adorno’s historical and sociological account of the disenchantment of the world and the destruction of aura within a culture fully administered by scientific rationality and economic reductionism sharply contrasts to Levinas’ transcendental phenomenology, and I argue that Adorno’s thoroughgoing refusal to constrain dialectical reflection is ultimately more compelling.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Nick Smith (2009). Commodification in Law: Ideologies, Intractabilities, and Hyperboles. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 42 (1):101-129.
Similar books and articles
Theodorus de Boer (1997). The Rationality of Transcendence: Studies in the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. J.C. Gieben.
Nick Smith (2008). Questions for a Reluctant Jurisprudence of Alterity. In Desmond Manderson (ed.), Essays on Levinas and Law: A Mosaic. Palgrave Macmillan.
Espen Hammer (2000). Adorno and Extreme Evil. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (4):75-93.
Asher Howoritz (2002). 'By a Hair's Breadth': Critique, Transcendence and the Ethical in Adorno and Levinas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (2).
J. M. Jackson (2010). Persecution and Social Histories: Towards an Adornian Critique of Levinas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (6):719-733.
Oona Eisenstadt (2006). Levinas and Adorno: Universalizing the Jew After Auschwitz. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 14 (1):131-151.
Hent de Vries (2005). Minimal Theologies: Critiques of Secular Reason in Adorno and Levinas. Johns Hopkins University Press.
J. M. Bernstein (2001). Adorno: Disenchantment and Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Carl Sachs (2011). The Acknowledgement of Transcendence: Anti-Theodicy in Adorno and Levinas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (3):273-294.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #61,303 of 1,102,926 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #62,002 of 1,102,926 )
How can I increase my downloads?