David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Res Publica 10 (4):353-377 (2004)
This paper develops a theory of civil disobedience informed by a deliberative conception of democracy. In particular, it explores the justification of illegal, public and political acts of protest in constitutional deliberative democracies. Civil disobedience becomes justifiable when processes of public deliberation fail to respect the principles of a deliberative democracy in the following three ways: when deliberation is insufficiently inclusive; when it is manipulated by powerful participants; and when it is insufficiently informed. As a contribution to ongoing processes of public deliberation, civil disobedience should be carried out in a way that respects the principles of deliberative democracy, which entails a commitment to persuasive, non-violent forms of protest.
|Keywords||civil disobedience contestation deliberative democracy justification non-violence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
William Smith (2008). Civil Disobedience and Social Power: Reflections on Habermas. Contemporary Political Theory 7 (1):72.
Elsa González, José Felix Lozano & Pedro Jesús Pérez (2009). Beyond the Conflict: Religion in the Public Sphere and Deliberative Democracy. Res Publica 15 (3):251-267.
William Smith (2008). Civil Disobedience and Social Power: Reflections on Habermas. Contemporary Political Theory 7 (1):72-89.
Patti Tamara Lenard (2010). What's Unique About Immigrant Protest? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (3):315 - 332.
Patti Tamara Lenard (2010). What’s Unique About Immigrant Protest? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (3):315-332.
Similar books and articles
Shane Ralston (2010). Dewey and Goodin on the Value of Monological Deliberation. Etica E Politica 12 (1):235-255.
Thom Brooks (2009). A Critique of Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):pp. 50-54.
Denise Vitale (2006). Between Deliberative and Participatory Democracy: A Contribution on Habermas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (6):739-766.
Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij (2012). Why Deliberative Democracy is (Still) Untenable. Public Affairs Quarterly 26 (3):199-220.
Joshua Cohen (2009). Philosophy, Politics, Democracy: Selected Essays. Harvard University Press.
Noëlle McAfee (2008). Democracy and the Political Unconscious. Columbia University Press.
John O'Neill (2002). The Rhetoric of Deliberation: Some Problems in Kantian Theories of Deliberative Democracy. Res Publica 8 (3):249-268.
Paul Nieuwenburg (2004). Learning to Deliberate: Aristotle on Truthfulness and Public Deliberation. Political Theory 32 (4):449-467.
Archon Fung (2005). Deliberation Before the Revolution: Toward an Ethics of Deliberative Democracy in an Unjust World. Political Theory 33 (3):397 - 419.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads87 ( #49,562 of 1,911,311 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #178,269 of 1,911,311 )
How can I increase my downloads?