David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (1):37-53 (2010)
The history of ethics contains many moral faculty theories, which usually are sorted by their metaphysics. The usual suspects include moral rationalism , moral sentiment theory and the varieties of ethical naturalism. Moral faculty theories differ importantly upon yet another dimension, on how widely it is distributed. Some, the Platonic elitists , suppose that moral truth can be discerned only by philosophical argument. Hence, they ascribe a revisionary task to normative theory, that of correcting nonphilosophers' moral errors. Others, the communalists , hold that the moral faculty is universally distributed. Hence, they hold that normative theory's task is not to revise, but rather to discern and explain the shared moral conception that we all apply in our ordinary moral lives. I here offer arguments to support commonalism
|Keywords||MORAL FACULTY CATECHISTIC ETHICS INTUITIONISM METAETHICS COMMON MORAL CONCEPTION|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Martin Bruder & Attila Tanyi (2014). Overdemanding Consequentialism? An Experimental Approach. Utilitas 26 (3):250-275.
Similar books and articles
Mark Johnson (2013). The Myth of the Moral Faculty: Response to Kirkby. Philosophical Psychology (4):1-5.
David Kirkby (2013). Why There Might Be a Moral Faculty: A Reply to Johnson. Philosophical Psychology (4):1-8.
John M. Collins (2005). Faculty Disputes. Mind and Language 19 (5):503-33.
Eve Garrard (2002). Forgiveness and the Holocaust. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (2):147-165.
Jeremy Bendik-Keymer (2005). Common Humanity and Human Rights. Social Philosophy Today 21:51-62.
Richard Dean (2006). The Value of Humanity in Kant's Moral Theory. Oxford University Press.
Mark Johnson (2011). There is No Moral Faculty. Philosophical Psychology 25 (3):409 - 432.
Peter Donovan (1986). Do Different Religions Share Moral Common Ground? Religious Studies 22 (3/4):367 - 375.
Nysanbayev Abdumalik (2008). Globalization and the Planetary Ethics Establishment. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 3:75-81.
Erich H. Loewy (1997). Finding an Appropriate Ethic in a World of Moral Acquaintances. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (1-2).
Ben Eggleston (2003). Everything is What It is, and Not Another Thing: Comments on Austin. Southwest Philosophy Review 19 (2):101-105.
Martin Krygier (2011). The Meaning of What We Have Done : Humanity, Invisibility, and Law in the European Settlement of Australia. In Christopher Cordner & Raimond Gaita (eds.), Philosophy, Ethics, and a Common Humanity: Essays in Honour of Raimond Gaita. Routledge
Andrew Altman (2012). Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity: Dispelling the Conceptual Fog. Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):280-308.
Chung-Ying Cheng (2012). World Humanities and Self-Reflection of Humanity: A Confucian-Neo-Confucian Perspective. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 39 (4):476-494.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads10 ( #410,793 of 1,932,601 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #456,397 of 1,932,601 )
How can I increase my downloads?