David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mind 105 (419):485-486 (1996)
In Smilansky (1996) I proposed an outline of a theory of responsibility and desert, which I claimed both (a) enables us to see responsibility as a condition for desert even in the major apparent counter-examples such as those proposed in Feldman (1995); and (b) represents the ordinary way of seeing the connection between responsibility and desert better than previous formulations. Behind this proposal lies a crucial distinction between two ways in which responsibility can be a condition for desert. From Feldman’s reply (1996) it seems that this crucial distinction was not sufﬁ- ciently brought out in my paper.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Shelly Kagan (2012). The Geometry of Desert. Oxford University Press.
Fred Feldman (1996). Responsibility as a Condition for Desert. Mind 105 (417):165-168.
Matt King (2012). Moral Responsibility and Merit. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6 (2).
Saul Smilansky (1996). Responsibility and Desert: Defending the Connection. Mind 105 (417):157-163.
F. Feldman (1996). Responsibility as a Condition for Desert. Mind 105 (417):165 - 168.
Carl Knight (2011). Responsibility, Desert, and Justice. In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press.
S. Smilansky (1996). Responsibility and Desert: Defending the Connection. Mind 105 (417):157 - 163.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #138,461 of 1,088,370 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?