Does the free will debate rest on a mistake?
Philosophical Papers 22 (3):173-88 (1993)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Compatibilism Ethics Free Will Morality Responsibility | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSaul Smilansky (2003). Compatibilism: The Argument From Shallowness. Philosophical Studies 115 (3):257-82.
Michael S. McKenna (1998). Moral Theory and Modified Compatibilism. Journal of Philosophical Research 23 (January):441-458.
Robert H. Kane (2002). Some Neglected Pathways in the Free Will Labyrinth. In Robert H. Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Saul Smilansky (2000). Free Will and Illusion. Oxford University Press.
Richard Double (1991). The Non-Reality of Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Saul Smilansky (1991). The Contrariety of Compatibilist Positions. Journal of Philosophical Research 16:293-309.
Mark H. Bernstein (1981). Moral Responsibility and Free Will. Southern Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):1-10.
Manuel Vargas (2010). The Revisionist Turn: A Brief History of Recent Work on Free Will. In Jesus Aguilar, Andrei Buckareff & Keith Frankish (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Action. Palgrave.
Richard Double (1996). Metaphilosophy and Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads21 ( #58,633 of 548,969 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,969 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
