Experience and God
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Fordham University Press (1995)
A modern philosopher described religion as “that region in which all the enigmas of the world are solved.” Smith argues in Experience and God that religion itself has become an enigma for modern man. In the book, smith attempts to reunite philosophy with religion. He argues that in recent decades the prevailing attitude has been chiefly one of indifference. This indifference, leading to the failure of understanding can be overcome only through radical reflection and self-criticism: a re-consideration of the nature of religion, its place in the total structure of human life, and its relations to the secular culture in which the faith of man must live. The task Smith lays out must be of a largely philosophical nature, not only because of the necessity to understand religion in relation to a comprehensive scheme of things, but also because the idea of religion is intimately connected with the issues of metaphysics. Smith’s purpose is to bridge the gap between the ontological approach to God as represented by Augustine, Anselm, and Bonaventure, and the cosmological approach represented by Thomas Aquinas and Albert the Great. Smith shows that, although the two approaches significantly differ, they can be interpreted as ways of leading the meditating mind to the Presence of God, through the soul and through the world.
|Keywords||Religion Philosophy Experience (Religion God|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$57.49 new $85.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BL51.S573 1995|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Eugene Thomas Long (1992). Experience and Natural Theology. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 31 (2/3):119 - 132.
Similar books and articles
Chad V. Meister & Paul Copan (eds.) (2007). The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Routledge.
Daniel Dombrowski (2010). Rival Concepts of God and Rival Versions of Mysticism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1-3):153-165.
Vincent Michael Colapietro & John Edwin Smith (eds.) (1997). Reason, Experience, and God: John E. Smith in Dialogue. Fordham University Press.
Keith E. Yandell (1973). God, Man, and Religion. New York,Mcgraw-Hill.
Michael L. Peterson & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.) (2004). Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell Pub..
William P. Alston (1991). Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Cornell University Press.
Edgar Sheffield Brightman (1940/1969). A Philosophy of Religion. New York, Greenwood Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?