David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 173 (3):353-373 (2010)
In this paper, I explore whether elementary classical mechanics adheres to the Principle of Composition of Causes as Mill claimed and as certain contemporary authors still seem to believe. Among other things, I provide a proof that if one reads Mill’s description of the principle literally, it does not hold in any general sense. In addition, I explore a separate notion of Composition of Causes and note that it too does not hold in elementary classical mechanics. Among the major morals is that there is no utility to describing classical mechanics in terms of Composition of Causes. This is both because the stated principles do not hold and because when one describes what actually does hold in classical mechanics in terms of the Composition of Causes, one introduces misleading associations that can generate errors just as claimed by Russell
|Keywords||Composition of Causes Causal powers Classical mechanics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Nancy Cartwright (1989). Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford University Press.
Immanuel Kant (2004). Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Cambridge University Press.
Bertrand Russell (1903). Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge University Press.
David Hume (1977). Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Clarendon Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Roman Frigg, On the Property Structure of Realist Collapse of Quantum Mechanics and the so-Called "Counting Anomaly".
Valia Allori, Detlef Duerr, Nino Zanghi & Sheldon Goldstein (2002). Seven Steps Toward the Classical World. Journal of Optics B 4:482–488.
William Demopoulos (2004). Elementary Propositions and Essentially Incomplete Knowledge: A Framework for the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Noûs 38 (1):86–109.
Fred Wilson (1983). Mill's 'Proof' of Utility and the Composition of Causes. Journal of Business Ethics 2 (2):135 - 155.
Newton C. A. da Costa & Décio Krause (1994). Schrödinger Logics. Studia Logica 53 (4):533 - 550.
P. A. M. Dirac (1930). The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford, the Clarendon Press.
Newton C. A. Costa & Décio Krause (1994). Schrödinger Logics. Studia Logica 53 (4).
Jan Hilgevoord & David Atkinson (2011). Time in Quantum Mechanics. In Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. OUP Oxford
Valia Allori & Nino Zanghi (2008). On the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics. Foundations of Physics 10.1007/S10701-008-9259-4 39 (1):20-32.
Robert Batterman (1992). Quantum Chaos and Semiclassical Mechanics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:50-65.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads59 ( #76,169 of 1,934,839 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,687 of 1,934,839 )
How can I increase my downloads?