David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Metaphilosophy 5 (3):187–197 (1974)
In "moral arguments" ("mind", 1958), Philippa foot displayed what she claimed to be a deduction of an evaluative conclusion from a non-Evaluative premise. In "freedom and reason", R m hare attacks foot-Style deductions on two grounds: he first offers a "reductio", Comparing them to a racist deduction; he then offers an explanation of where all of these arguments go awry. I argue in my paper's first part that hare's explanation rests upon a defective criterion of entailment. In passing I show how this counts against certain noncognitivist arguments that purport to show that moral judgments cannot be factual. In the second part I show that foot-Style deductions--And the racist deduction as well--Are either unsound or else superfluous to the naturalist's enterprise. From this I draw certain morals as to what conditions a successful naturalism must satisfy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John R. Searle (1964). How to Derive "Ought" From "Is". Philosophical Review 73 (1):43-58.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Svetozar Stojanović (1963). Hare's Argument Against Ethical Naturalism. Mind 72 (286):264-267.
Thomas L. Carson (1986). Hare's Defense of Utilitarianism. Philosophical Studies 50 (1):97 - 115.
Brice Noel Fleming (1955). Mr. Hare and Naturalism. Analysis 15 (4):82 - 85.
Marvin Glass (1973). Philippa Foot's Naturalism: A New Version of the Breakdown Theory of Ethics. Mind 82 (327):417-420.
Christopher Toner (2008). Sorts of Naturalism: Requirements for a Successful Theory. Metaphilosophy 39 (2):220–250.
Rosalind Hursthouse, Gavin Lawrence & Warren Quinn (eds.) (1995). Virtues and Reasons: Philippa Foot and Moral Theory: Essays in Honour of Philippa Foot. Oxford University Press.
Joseph Millum (2006). Natural Goodness and Natural Evil. Ratio 19 (2):199–213.
Newton Garver & Peter H. Hare (eds.) (1986). Naturalism and Rationality. Prometheus Books.
Richard Eggerman (1978). Hare, Foot, and the Justification of Moral Claims. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):111-119.
John Hacker-Wright (2009). What is Natural About Foot's Ethical Naturalism? Ratio 22 (3):308-321.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #274,000 of 1,699,425 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #362,609 of 1,699,425 )
How can I increase my downloads?