David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy Compass 4 (4):639-665 (2009)
One of the most striking differences between Frege's Begriffsschrift (logical system) and standard contemporary systems of logic is the inclusion in the former of the judgement stroke: a symbol which marks those propositions which are being asserted , that is, which are being used to express judgements . There has been considerable controversy regarding both the exact purpose of the judgement stroke, and whether a system of logic should include such a symbol. This paper explains the intended role of the judgement stroke in a way that renders it readily comprehensible why Frege insisted that this symbol was an essential part of his logical system. The key point here is that Frege viewed logic as the study of inference relations amongst acts of judgement , rather than – as in the typical contemporary view – of consequence relations amongst certain objects (propositions or well-formed formulae). The paper also explains why Frege's use of the judgement stroke is not in conflict with his avowed anti-psychologism, and why Wittgenstein's criticism of the judgement stroke as 'logically quite meaningless' is unfounded. The key point here is that while the judgement stroke has no content , its use in logic and mathematics is subject to a very stringent norm of assertion.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Gregory Currie (1987). Remarks on Frege's Conception of Inference. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 28 (1):55-68.
V. H. Dudman (1970). Frege's Judgment-Stroke. Philosophical Quarterly 20 (79):150-161.
Victor Dudman (1971). Peano's Review of Frege's Grundgesetze. Southern Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):25-37.
Citations of this work BETA
Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2010). “He Doesn't Want to Prove This or That”—on the Very Young Wittgenstein. Philosophical Books 51 (2):102-116.
Peter Pagin (2012). Assertion, Inference, and Consequence. Synthese 187 (3):869 - 885.
Similar books and articles
Øystein Linnebo (2003). Frege's Conception of Logic: From Kant to Grundgesetze. Manuscrito 26 (2):235-252.
D. Greimann (2000). The Judgement-Stroke as a Truth-Operator: A New Interpretation of the Logical Form of Sentences in Frege's Scientific Language. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 52 (2):213-238.
Nicholas J. J. Smith (2000). Frege's Judgement Stroke. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (2):153 – 175.
William W. Taschek (2008). Truth, Assertion, and the Horizontal: Frege on "the Essence of Logic". Mind 117 (466):375-401.
Daniele Mezzadri (2010). Language and Logic in Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Dissertation, University of Stirling
David Andrew Bell (1979). Frege's Theory of Judgement. Oxford University Press.
Marc Pauly & Martin van Hees (2006). Logical Constraints on Judgement Aggregation. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (6):569 - 585.
M. Textor (2010). Frege on Judging as Acknowledging the Truth. Mind 119 (475):615-655.
Ivan Welty (2011). Frege on Indirect Proof. History and Philosophy of Logic 32 (3):283-290.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads52 ( #30,748 of 1,101,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #17,091 of 1,101,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?