Facilitating 'perspectival reciprocity' in medication: Some reflections on a failed case [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Human Studies 23 (1):1-21 (2000)
Mediation services arise in contexts where the notions of community cohesion, relationship integrity and social order are valued over their opposites (disorder, dissent, conflict etc). Yet it is not at all clear whether and how the mediation of conflict works to re-establish harmony or consensus. Indeed it is not at all clear that mediation is always effective or just. It has even been suggested that some conflicts (e.g. work-place, commercial and sexual assault) are either not resolved or not resolved justly by mediation. On the other hand, advocates maintain that mediation can bring resolution and repair to ongoing relationships, promote community harmony, and empower people to be self-determining in the construction and maintenance of their resolutions. Whether mediation is adjudged positively or not, all mediation is instantiated in, indeed performed through, talk. In this paper I examine mediations from an Australian mediation program, and use Conversation Analysis to expose the practical methods by which mediators achieve consensus between disputants. I then examine a case in which mediation has failed to produce the sought-after consensus, and explore one way of understanding the failure of mediation in that case.
|Keywords||Intersubjectivity mediation alternative dispute resolution conflict and conflict resolution conversation analysis Alfred Schutz|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Saskia Polder-Verkiel (2012). Online Responsibility: Bad Samaritanism and the Influence of Internet Mediation. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):117-141.
Asle H. Kiran (2012). Technological Presence: Actuality and Potentiality in Subject Constitution. [REVIEW] Human Studies 35 (1):77-93.
Nicholas Joll (2010). Gaps: An Inquiry Into Determination and Deformation in Adorno. Studies in Social and Political Thought 17:12–30.
Marc Lampe (2001). Mediation as an Ethical Adjunct of Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 31 (2):165 - 173.
Nancy N. Dubler (2011). Bioethics Mediation: A Guide to Shaping Shared Solutions. Vanderbilt University Press.
Jonathan Crowe & Rachael Field (2008). The Problem of Legitimacy in Mediation. Contemporary Issues in Law 9:48-60.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #446,540 of 1,102,965 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,509 of 1,102,965 )
How can I increase my downloads?