Hope and critical theory
Critical Horizons 6 (1):45-61 (2005)
|Abstract||In the first part of the paper I consider the relative neglect of hope in the tradition of critical theory. I attribute this neglect to a low estimation of the cognitive, aesthetic, and moral value of hope, and to the strong—but, I argue, contingent—association that holds between hope and religion. I then distinguish three strategies for thinking about the justification of social hope; one which appeals to a notion of unfulfilled or frustrated natural human capacities, another which invokes a providential order, and a third which questions the very appropriateness of justification, turning instead to a notion of ungroundable hope. Different senses of ungroundable hope are distinguished and by way of conclusion I briefly consider their relevance for the project of critique today.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jayne M. Waterworth (2003). A Philosophical Analysis of Hope. Palgrave Macmillan.
Matthew Ratcliffe (forthcoming). What is It to Lose Hope? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences.
Luc Bovens (1999). The Value of Hope. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):667-681.
Shane O'Neill (2008). Philosophy, Social Hope and Democratic Criticism: Critical Theory for a Global Age. Critical Horizons 9 (1):60-76.
Craig Browne (2005). Hope, Critique, and Utopia. Critical Horizons 6 (1):63-86.
Norman Geras (2008). Social Hope and State Lawlessness. Critical Horizons 9 (1):90-98.
Nicholas H. Smith (2008). Analysing Hope. Critical Horizons 9 (1):5-23.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #133,479 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?