David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
I am interested in the philosophical prospects of what is called ‘predicativism given the natural numbers’. And today, in particular, I want to critically discuss one argument that has been offered to suggest that this kind of predicativism can’t have a stable philosophical motivation. Actually you don’t really need to know about predicativism to find some stand-alone interest in the theme I will be discussing. But still, it’s worth putting things into context. So I’m going to start by spending a bit of time introducing you to the background.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
F. John Clendinnen (1977). Inference, Practice and Theory. Synthese 34 (1):89 - 132.
Gerhard Jäger & Thomas Strahm (1996). Some Theories with Positive Induction of Ordinal Strength Φω. Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (3):818-842.
T. Parent (2013). Note on Induction. Think 12 (33):37-39.
Geoffrey Hellman (2004). Predicativism as a Philosophical Position. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 3:295-312.
Audrey Yap (2009). Predicativity and Structuralism in Dedekind's Construction of the Reals. Erkenntnis 71 (2):157 - 173.
Solomon Feferman (2004). Comments on “Predicativity as a philosophical position” by G. Hellman. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 3:313-323.
Francesca Boccuni (2010). Plural grundgesetze. Studia Logica 96 (2):315-330.
Added to index2010-06-06
Total downloads31 ( #133,028 of 1,911,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #255,606 of 1,911,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?