David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Metaphilosophy 34 (4):476-487 (2003)
This article asks whether justice is binary, whether matters are either-or with respect to it. This question has been inexplicably neglected, and the elementary conceptual work has not been done. We consider this question through exploring the implications of free-will-related justice. We see that there are actually two questions of very different scope here, and that two distinct notions of binarity need to be distinguished. In the process, the plausibility of considering justice as a binary notion is evaluated
|Keywords||misfortune free will injustice binary justice|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Randy E. Barnett (1985). Pursuing Justice in a Free Society: Part One—Power Vs. Liberty. Criminal Justice Ethics 4 (2):50-72.
Kosta Došen & Zoran Petrić (2002). Bicartesian Coherence. Studia Logica 71 (3):331 - 353.
Geoffrey Cupit (1996). Justice as Fittingness. Oxford University Press.
Saul Smilansky (2006). Control, Desert and the Difference Between Distributive and Retributive Justice. Philosophical Studies 131 (3):511 - 524.
Hennie Lötter (1999). Rawls, Young, and the Scope of Justice. Theoria 46 (94):90-107.
Peter Vallentyne (2003). Justice in General: An Introduction. In , Equality and Justice: Justice in General. Routledge.
Thornton C. Lockwood (2006). Ethical Justice and Political Justice. Phronesis 51 (1):29 - 48.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #160,007 of 1,096,394 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?