Graduate studies at Western
Metaphilosophy 34 (4):476-487 (2003)
|Abstract||This article asks whether justice is binary, whether matters are either-or with respect to it. This question has been inexplicably neglected, and the elementary conceptual work has not been done. We consider this question through exploring the implications of free-will-related justice. We see that there are actually two questions of very different scope here, and that two distinct notions of binarity need to be distinguished. In the process, the plausibility of considering justice as a binary notion is evaluated|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Randy E. Barnett (1985). Pursuing Justice in a Free Society: Part One—Power Vs. Liberty. Criminal Justice Ethics 4 (2):50-72.
Peter Vallentyne (2003). Justice in General: An Introduction. In Peter Vallentyne (ed.), Equality and Justice: Justice in General. Routledge.
Hennie Lötter (1999). Rawls, Young, and the Scope of Justice. Theoria 46 (94):90-107.
Saul Smilansky (2006). Control, Desert and the Difference Between Distributive and Retributive Justice. Philosophical Studies 131 (3):511 - 524.
Geoffrey Cupit (1996). Justice as Fittingness. Oxford University Press.
Kosta Došen & Zoran Petrić (2002). Bicartesian Coherence. Studia Logica 71 (3):331 - 353.
Thornton C. Lockwood (2006). Ethical Justice and Political Justice. Phronesis 51 (1):29 - 48.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #131,909 of 738,868 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?