David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41 (1/2):93-105 (1980)
For Meinong, familiarly, fictional entities are not created, but rather merely discovered (or picked out) from the inexhaustible realm of Aussersein (beyond being and non-being). The phenomenologist Roman Ingarden, in contrast, offers in his Literary Work of Art of 1931 a constructive ontology of fiction, which views fictional objects as entities which are created by the acts of an author (as laws, for example, are created by acts of parliament). We outline the logic of fiction which is implied by Ingarden’s approach, showing how it distinguishes the properties possessed by fictional objects (for instance of having been created by such and such an author in such and such a work) from characteristics (for instance of smoking a pipe, of living in Baker Street) which are merely associated with such objects.
|Keywords||logic of fiction constructivism Roman Ingarden social construction|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Łukasz Kosowski (2008). Noema in the Light of Contradiction, Conflict, and Nonsense: The Noema as Possibly Thinkable Content. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 24 (3):243-259.
Jacek Juliusz Jadacki (1996). Alexius Meinong and Polish Philosophy. Axiomathes 7 (1-2):241-266.
Similar books and articles
Peter McCormick (1976). The Literary Work of Art: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic, and Theory of Literature. By Roman Ingarden. Translated by G. G. Grabowicz. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973. Pp. Lxxiii, 415, $15.The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art. By Roman Ingarden. Translated by R. A. Crowley and K. R. Olson. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973. Pp. Xxx, 436. $15.Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics: Essays. Edited by P. Graff and S. Krzemién-Ojak. Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publishers, 1975. Pp. 267. [REVIEW] Dialogue 15 (3):511-515.
Karel Lambert (1983). Meinong and the Principle of Independence: Its Place in Meinong's Theory of Objects and its Significance in Contemporary Philosophical Logic. Cambridge University Press.
Urszula M. Żegleń (1996). Meinong and Ingarden on Negative Judgments. Axiomathes 7 (1-2):267-277.
K. A. (2002). Meinong's Much Maligned Modal Moment. Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (1):95-118.
A. K. Jorgensen (2002). Meinong's Much Maligned Modal Moment. Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (1):95-118.
Daniel von Wachter (2005). Roman Ingarden’s Ontology: Existential Dependence, Substances, Ideas, and Other Things Empiricists Do Not Like. In A. Chrudzimski (ed.), Existence, Culture, and Persons: The Ontology of Roman Ingarden. Ontos
Franck Lihoreau (ed.) (2011). Truth in Fiction. Ontos Verlag.
Carlo Ierna (2009). Relations in the Early Works of Meinong and Husserl. Meinong Studies 3:7-36.
Barry Smith (1978). An Essay in Formal Ontology. Grazer Philosophische Studien 6:39–62.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads119 ( #30,120 of 1,790,387 )
Recent downloads (6 months)68 ( #14,257 of 1,790,387 )
How can I increase my downloads?