Ingarden vs. meinong on the logic of fiction
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41 (1/2):93-105 (1980)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesCarlo Ierna (2009). Relations in the Early Works of Meinong and Husserl. Meinong Studies 3:7-36.
Franck Lihoreau (ed.) (2011). Truth in Fiction. Ontos Verlag.
Daniel von Wachter (2005). Roman Ingarden’s Ontology: Existential Dependence, Substances, Ideas, and Other Things Empiricists Do Not Like. In A. Chrudzimski (ed.), Existence, Culture, and Persons: The Ontology of Roman Ingarden. Ontos.
A. K. Jorgensen (2002). Meinong's Much Maligned Modal Moment. Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (1):95-118.
K. A. (2002). Meinong's Much Maligned Modal Moment. Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (1):95-118.
Urszula M. Żegleń (1996). Meinong and Ingarden on Negative Judgments. Axiomathes 7 (1-2).
Karel Lambert (1983). Meinong and the Principle of Independence: Its Place in Meinong's Theory of Objects and its Significance in Contemporary Philosophical Logic. Cambridge University Press.
Barry Smith (1978). An Essay in Formal Ontology. Grazer Philosophische Studien 6:39–62.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads23 ( #53,914 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,198 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
