David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Data and Knowledge Engineering 20:287–303 (1996)
The paper is a contribution to formal ontology. It seeks to use topological means in order to derive ontological laws pertaining to the boundaries and interiors of wholes, to relations of contact and connectedness, to the concepts of surface, point, neighbourhood, and so on. The basis of the theory is mereology, the formal theory of part and whole, a theory which is shown to have a number of advantages, for ontological purposes, over standard treatments of topology in set-theoretic terms. One central goal of the paper is to provide a rigorous formulation of Brentano's thesis to the effect that a boundary can exist as a matter of necessity only as part of a whole of higher dimension which it is the boundary of. It concludes with a brief survey of current applications of mereotopology in areas such as natural-language analysis, geographic information systems, machine vision, naive physics, and database and knowledge engineering.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Thomas Mormann (2013). Heyting Mereology as a Framework for Spatial Reasoning. Axiomathes 23 (1):137- 164.
Jeffrey Grupp (2006). Mereological Nihilism: Quantum Atomism and the Impossibility of Material Constitution. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 16 (3):245-386.
Rory Madden (2015). The Naive Topology of the Conscious Subject. Noûs 49 (1):55-70.
Anthony G. Cohn & Achille C. Varzi (2003). Mereotopological Connection. Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (4):357-390.
Chris Fields (2012). Consistent Quantum Mechanics Admits No Mereotopology. Axiomathes (1):1-10.
Similar books and articles
Maureen Donnelly & Barry Smith (2003). Layers: A New Approach to Locating Objects in Space. In W. Kuhn M. F. Worboys & S. Timpf (eds.), Spatial Information Theory: Foundations of Geographic Information Science. Springer
Achille C. Varzi (1998). Basic Problems of Mereotopology. In Nicola Guarino (ed.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Ios Press 29–38.
Barry Smith (1997). On Substances, Accidents and Universals: In Defence of a Constituent Ontology. Philosophical Papers 26 (1):105-127.
Barry Smith (1997). Boundaries: An Essay in Mereotopology. In Lewis H. Hahn (ed.), Philosophy of Roderick Chisholm (Library of Living Philosophers). Open Court
Barry Smith & Kevin Mulligan (1983). Framework for Formal Ontology. Topoi 2 (1):73-85.
B. Smith & D. M. Mark (1998). Ontology and Geographic Kinds. In T. Poiker & N. Chrisman (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, 308–320. International Geographic Union
Barry Smith & Achille C. Varzi (2000). Fiat and Bona Fide Boundaries. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2):401-420.
Barry Smith (1999). Truth and the Visual Field. In Jean Petitot (ed.), Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press 317--329.
Achille C. Varzi (1996). Parts, Wholes, and Part-Whole Relations: The Prospects of Mereotopology. Data and Knowledge Engineering 20:259–286.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads59 ( #74,424 of 1,911,378 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #319,111 of 1,911,378 )
How can I increase my downloads?