David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (2):191 – 219 (2006)
In Voir l'invisible Michel Henry applies his philosophy of autoaffection (which is both inspired by, and critical of, Husserl) to the realm of aesthetics. Henry claims that autoaffection, as non-objective experience, is essential not only to self-experience, but also to the experience of objects and their qualities. Intentionality tempts us to experience objects merely from the 'outside', but aesthetic experience returns us to the inner life of objects as a lived experience. On the basis of an examination of Henry's aesthetic theory in the light of Husserl's analysis of our experience of visible objects, I conclude that revisions are required in both Husserl's and Henry's approaches: Husserl's noema must be considered to be a lived-through experience, and non-objective lived-through experience must be recognized as primordial evidence; Henry's claim that intentionality makes unreal all that it objectifies must be replaced by a recognition of the interdependence between autoaffection and heteroaffection.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Dan Zahavi (1999). Self-Awareness and Alterity: A Phenomenological Investigation. Northwestern University Press.
John Drummond (1990). Husserlian Intentionality and Non-Foundational Realism: Noema and Object. Springer.
Wassily Kandinsky (1947). Point and Line to Plane. Dover Publications.
Citations of this work BETA
Daniel J. Whiting (2008). Conservatives and Racists: Inferential Role Semantics and Pejoratives. Philosophia 36 (3):375-388.
Similar books and articles
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (1990). The Art of Seeing: An Interpretation of the Aesthetic Encounter. Getty Center for Education in the Arts.
Monika Bokiniec (2009). Mieczysław Wallis: Experience and Value. Estetika 46 (1):75-96.
Keith Lehrer (2011). What Intentionality Is Like. Acta Analytica 26 (1):3-14.
Mikel Dufrenne (1973). The Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience. Evanston [Ill.]Northwestern University Press.
Antonio Calcagno (2008). Michel Henry's Non-Intentionality Thesis and Husserlian Phenomenology. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 39 (2):117-129.
Derek Matravers (2003). The Aesthetic Experience. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2):158-174.
David Woodruff Smith (1992). Consciousness in Action. Synthese 90 (1):119-43.
Aaron Smuts (2005). Anesthetic Experience. Philosophy and Literature 29 (1):97-113.
Michael Purcell (2010). IJPR: Beyond the Limit and Limiting the Beyond. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1):121-138.
Mihail Neamţu (2001). „Născut, iar nu făcut“ Note despre filozofia Revelaţiei la Michel Henry. Studia Phaenomenologica 1 (3-4):391-416.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads63 ( #71,355 of 1,934,535 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,193 of 1,934,535 )
How can I increase my downloads?