David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (2):191 – 219 (2006)
In Voir l'invisible Michel Henry applies his philosophy of autoaffection (which is both inspired by, and critical of, Husserl) to the realm of aesthetics. Henry claims that autoaffection, as non-objective experience, is essential not only to self-experience, but also to the experience of objects and their qualities. Intentionality tempts us to experience objects merely from the 'outside', but aesthetic experience returns us to the inner life of objects as a lived experience. On the basis of an examination of Henry's aesthetic theory in the light of Husserl's analysis of our experience of visible objects, I conclude that revisions are required in both Husserl's and Henry's approaches: Husserl's noema must be considered to be a lived-through experience, and non-objective lived-through experience must be recognized as primordial evidence; Henry's claim that intentionality makes unreal all that it objectifies must be replaced by a recognition of the interdependence between autoaffection and heteroaffection.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
John Drummond (1990). Husserlian Intentionality and Non-Foundational Realism: Noema and Object. Springer.
John J. Drummond (1978). On the Nature of Perceptual Appearances, or Is Husserl an Aristotelian? New Scholasticism 52 (1):1-22.
James G. Hart (1992). Being's Mindfulness: The Noema of Transcendental Idealism. In. In John Drummond & Lester Embree (eds.), The Phenomenology of the Noema. Springer. 111--135.
James G. Hart (1998). Genesis, Instinct, and Reconstruction: Nam-in Lee's Edmund Husserl's Phänomenologie der Instincte. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 15 (2):101-123.
Wassily Kandinsky (1947/1979). Point and Line to Plane. Dover Publications.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (1990). The Art of Seeing: An Interpretation of the Aesthetic Encounter. Getty Center for Education in the Arts.
Michael Purcell (2010). IJPR: Beyond the Limit and Limiting the Beyond. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1):121-138.
Aaron Smuts (2005). Anesthetic Experience. Philosophy and Literature 29 (1):97-113.
David Woodruff Smith (1992). Consciousness in Action. Synthese 90 (1):119-43.
Derek Matravers (2003). The Aesthetic Experience. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2):158-174.
Antonio Calcagno (2008). Michel Henry's Non-Intentionality Thesis and Husserlian Phenomenology. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 39 (2):117-129.
Mikel Dufrenne (1973). The Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience. Evanston [Ill.]Northwestern University Press.
Keith Lehrer (2011). What Intentionality Is Like. Acta Analytica 26 (1):3-14.
Monika Bokiniec (2009). Mieczysław Wallis: Experience and Value. Estetika 46 (1):75-96.
Mihail Neamţu (2001). „Născut, iar nu făcut“ Note despre filozofia Revelaţiei la Michel Henry. Studia Phaenomenologica 1 (3-4):391-416.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #34,894 of 1,088,831 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,665 of 1,088,831 )
How can I increase my downloads?