Graduate studies at Western
Studies in East European Thought 36 (4):233-250 (1988)
|Abstract||Communism, in Marx' mind, did not mean simple liberation, but the economics of liberation. The realm of necessity (technē) was to become the primary field for emancipation (praxis), the latter taking form in new institutions, responsive to real socio-economic needs. In this sense, the problem of technocracy and the corporatist ethos in Marx are part of a broader discursive structure, which links the experiences of workers through the industrial revolution with the philosophies ofpraxis as they reach from Hegel through Marković.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Sean Sayers (2003). Creative Activity and Alienation in Hegel and Marx. Historical Materialism 11 (1):107-128.
Arno Wouters (1993). Marx's Embryology of Society. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (2):149-179.
He Lai & Zhang Lin (2008). On the Political Significance of Marx's Practical Philosophy. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (2):267 - 281.
Sean Sayers (2011). Marx and Alienation: Essays on Hegelian Themes. Palgrave Macmillan.
Stanley Moore (1971). Marx and the Origin of Dialectical Materialism1. Inquiry 14 (1-4):420-429.
Peter Singer (2000). Marx: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Michael Taylor (1986). Elster's Marx. Inquiry 29 (1-4):3 – 10.
Lai He (2008). On the Political Significance of Marx's Practical Philosophy. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (2):267-281.
Norman Levine (2012). Marx's Discourse with Hegel. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #131,868 of 739,395 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,395 )
How can I increase my downloads?