David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:143 - 148 (1988)
Neo-Skinnerianism differs from Radical Behaviorism in at least three important respects: (1) its willingness to entertain cognitive accounts of the processes underlying behavioral dispositions, (b) its reluctance to assert that the results of animal experiments can be used to predict and control human behavior, and (c) its ability to side step folk psychology's major criticism of operant theory. While eschewing Radical Behaviorism's ambition to transform psychology (and, indeed, human society itself), it nonetheless joins issue with a centuries-old debate over human nature, and may eventually help to resolve it.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John C. Malone Jr & Natalie M. Cruchon (2001). Radical Behaviorism and the Rest of Psychology: A Review/Précis of Skinner's "About Behaviorism". Behavior and Philosophy 29:31 - 57.
Gordon R. Foxall (1999). The Contextual Stance. Philosophical Psychology 12 (1):25-46.
Gordon R. Foxall (2007). Intentional Behaviorism. Behavior and Philosophy 35:1 - 55.
Brent D. Slife, Stephen C. Yanchar & Brant Williams (1999). Conceptions of Determinism in Radical Behaviorism: A Taxonomy. Behavior and Philosophy 27 (2):75 - 96.
Stephen LeDoux (1993). About Behaviorology: An Introduction to the Incompatible Paradigms and Historical and Philosophical Developments Among Disciplines Addressing the Behavior of Individuals. Abcs.
Frank Diehl (1934). An Historical and Critical Study of Radical Behaviorism as a Philosophical Doctrine. Baltimore.
P. Harzem (2004). Behaviorism for New Psychology: What Was Wrong with Behaviorism and What is Wrong with It Now. Behavior and Philosophy 32 (1):5-12.
Bruce A. Thyer (ed.) (1999). The Philosophical Legacy of Behaviorism. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
G. E. Zuriff (1985). Behaviorism: A Conceptual Reconstruction. Columbia University Press.
Vicki L. Lee (1988). Beyond Behaviorism. L. Erlbaum Associates.
François Tonneau (2007). Behaviorism and Chisholm's Challenge. Behavior and Philosophy 35:139 - 148.
Mecca Chiesa (1994). Radical Behaviorism: The Philosophy and the Science. Authors Cooperative.
Richard F. Kitchener (2004). Logical Positivism, Naturalistic Epistemology, and the Foundations of Psychology. Behavior and Philosophy 32 (1):37 - 54.
Michael Corriveau (1972). Phenomenology, Psychology, and Radical Behaviorism: Skinner and Merleau-Ponty On Behavior. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 3 (1):7-34.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads8 ( #173,509 of 1,102,446 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #85,067 of 1,102,446 )
How can I increase my downloads?