On Humeans, anti-Humeans, and motivation: A reply to Pettit
Mind 97 (388):589-595 (1988)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesCharles R. Pigden (ed.) (2009). Hume on Motivation and Virtue: New Essays. Palgrave Macmillan.
Philip Clark (2000). What Goes Without Saying in Metaethics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2):357-379.
Laurence Thomas (1988). Moral Motivation: Kantians Versus Humeans (and Evolution). Midwest Studies in Philosophy 13 (1):367-383.
G. F. Schueler (2009). The Humean Theory of Motivation Rejected. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (1):103-122.
Christopher G. Framarin (2008). Motivation-Encompassing Attitudes. Philosophical Explorations 11 (2):121 – 130.
Kent Hurtig (2010). Why Internalists About Reasons Should Be Humeans About Motivation. In Charles R. Pigden (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue. Palgrave Macmillan.
Mark van Roojen (2002). Should Motivational Humeans Be Humeans About Rationality? Topoi 21 (1-2):209-215.
Philip Pettit (1987). Humeans, Anti-Humeans, and Motivation. Mind 96 (384):530-533.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads26 ( #47,706 of 549,520 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,520 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
