David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review 4 (1-2):212-238 (1990)
Much recent work on the intellectual background of Austrian economics reveals an unfortunate lack of awareness of the distinct nature of the Austrian contribution to philosophy, from which the Austrian economists drew many of their ideas. The present essay offers a sketch of this contribution, contrasting Austrian philosophy especially with the modes of philosophy dominant in Germany. This makes it possible to throw new light on the relations on Mises, Kant and the Vienna circle, and it allows us also to establish the extent to which Austrian economics might properly be seen as being allied to the German hermeneutic tradition of Dilthey, Gadamer, et al. The essay concludes with a criticism of the hermeneutic relativism recently canvassed by some Austrian economists, concentrating especially on the work of Don Lavoie, whose writing are treated as symptomatic of a wider and somewhat regrettable trend.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Klaus Hedwig (1987). Brentano's Hermeneutics. Topoi 6 (1):3-10.
Kevin Mulligan (ed.) (1987). Speech Act and Sachverhalt: Reinach and the Foundations of Realist Phenomenology. Reidel.
Kevin Mulligan & Barry Smith (1988). Mach and Ehrenfels: The Foundations of Gestalt Theory. In Barry Smith (ed.), Foundations of Gestalt Theory. 1988. 124.
Citations of this work BETA
Paul Lewis (2010). Certainly Not! A Critical Realist Recasting of Ludwig von Mises's Methodology of the Social Sciences. Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (3):277-299.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Mayer (1998). Boettke's Austrian Critique of Mainstream Economics: An Empiricist's Response. Critical Review 12 (1-2):151-171.
Ricardo F. Crespo, Reappraising Austrian Economics' Basic Tenets in the Light of Aristotelian Ideas.
Gustavo Cevolani (2011). Hayek in the Lab. Austrian School, Game Theory, and Experimental Economics. Logic and Philosophy of Science 9 (1):429-436.
Christopher Torr (1993). >What Can Austrian Economists Learn From the Post Keynesians? Reply to Davidson. Critical Review 7 (2-3):399-406.
Gabriel J. Zanotti, Intersubjectivity, Subjectivism, Social Sciences, and the Austrian School of Economics.
Milan Zafirovski (2011). Weber's Sociological Elements in Mises' Economics of Human Action. Social Epistemology 24 (2):75-98.
Paul Davidson (1989). The Economics of Ignorance or Ignorance of Economics? Critical Review 3 (3-4):467-487.
K. H. Müller (2011). The Missing Links in S.J. Schmidt's Rewriting Operations. An Austrian Contribution. Constructivist Foundations 7 (1):35-37.
Maria E. Reicher (2006). Austrian Aesthetics. In Markus Textor (ed.), The Austrian Contribution to Analytic Philosophy. Routledge.
Stephan Boehm & Karl Farmer (1993). Why the Acrimony? Reply to Davidson. Critical Review 7 (2-3):407-421.
Benjamin Schnieder (2006). Particularised Attributes : An Austrian Tale. In Markus Textor (ed.), The Austrian Contribution to Analytic Philosophy. Routledge. 1--130.
Added to index2011-10-18
Total downloads18 ( #100,656 of 1,168,025 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #140,420 of 1,168,025 )
How can I increase my downloads?