David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Historical Materialism 11 (1):185-194 (2003)
Chris Arthur‟s body of work counts as a very important and original contribution to systematic dialectics, and I have profited immensely from his writings over the years. However we disagree on a number of points. Some have to do with the relatively secondary question of the intellectual relationship between Hegel and Marx; others involve more substantive matters. In his reply to my review of Joseph McCarney‟s Hegel on History Arthur distinguishes three different versions of the thesis that there is a “homology” between the logic of capital (in a Marxian understanding of it) and Hegel‟s “idea.” I shall comment briefly on each and then conclude with a general remark.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul E. Griffiths (2007). The Phenomena of Homology. Biology and Philosophy 22 (5):643-658.
Heather Jamniczky (2005). Biological Pluralism and Homology. Philosophy of Science 72 (5):687-698.
Ingo Brigandt (2003). Homology in Comparative, Molecular, and Evolutionary Developmental Biology: The Radiation of a Concept. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution) 299:9-17.
Tony Smith (2000). On Rosenthal's "Escape" From Hegel. Science and Society 64 (4):489 - 496.
Ingo Brigandt (2002). Homology and the Origin of Correspondence. Biology and Philosophy 17 (3):389–407.
Tony Smith (1990). The Logic of Marx's Capital: Replies to Hegelian Criticisms. State University of New York Press.
Tony Smith (1999). The Relevance of Systematic Dialectics to Marxian Thought: A Reply to Rosenthal. Historical Materialism 4 (1):215-240.
Karel Kleisner (2007). The Formation of the Theory of Homology in Biological Sciences. Acta Biotheoretica 55 (4):317-340.
Christopher Arthur (2003). Once More on the Homology Thesis: A Response to Smith's Reply. Historical Materialism 11 (1):195-198.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #155,502 of 1,793,059 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #118,986 of 1,793,059 )
How can I increase my downloads?