Journal of Value Inquiry 23 (4):299-318 (1989)
|Abstract||This essay argues that Dworkin, Feinberg and others who claim exceptions against the principle of paternalism for the sake of preventing seroius physical harm are forced to treat mature adults as mental incompetents and that they are forced to do so by the prevailing concept of paternalism itself. The essay then shows how we can get around this dilemma by re-thinking paternalism as part of distinctly paternal relationships of domination and inequality.|
|Keywords||paternalism democracy autonomy patriarchy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dan W. Brock (1985). Review Essay/a Case for Limited Paternalism. Criminal Justice Ethics 4 (2):79-88.
Thomas Nys, Yvonne Denier & T. Vandevelde (eds.) (2007). Autonomy & Paternalism: Reflections on the Theory and Practice of Health Care. Peeters.
Bjørn Hofmann (2003). Technological Paternalism: On How Medicine has Reformed Ethics and How Technology Can Refine Moral Theory. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):343-352.
Carson Strong (1984). Paternalism in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (1).
Simon Clarke (2002). A Definition of Paternalism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (1):81-91.
Franklin G. Miller & Alan Wertheimer (2007). Facing Up to Paternalism in Research Ethics. Hastings Center Report 37 (3):24-34.
Jonathan Schonsheck (1991). Deconstructing Community Self-Paternalism. Law and Philosophy 10 (1):29 - 49.
Richard Arneson (2005). Joel Feinberg and the Justification of Hard Paternalism. Legal Theory 11 (3):259-284.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #43,395 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,384 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?