David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
History and Theory 40 (2):241–260 (2001)
This article probes some of the issues The Great War and Modern Memory raises today, whether by Fussell himself, by critics at the time of its original publication, or by rereading the book anew now, in the context of a veritable renaissance in the study of World War I and of the revolution effected by the "literary turn" in historical study. I situate Fussell's book against the backdrop of three foundational works or points of view in cultural history that came to the forefront after 1975. My purpose is not to chide Fussell for failing to anticipate the future directions of the cultural history of war, but rather to show how his work fits into the development of that history.I argue that The Great War and Modern Memory itself became a lieu de mémoire or "site of memory" of the Great War. But like many very successful works, Fussell's book became famous not exclusively or even primarily because of its originality, but because of its ability to reformulate or reinscribe pre-existing ways of understanding. As critic and as veteran, Fussell reasserted the "evidence of experience" as the cornerstone of war writing in the twentieth century. In addition, some of the impact of The Great War and Modern Memory can be explained by the way it supported the most venerable narrative explanation of the Great War, that of tragedy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul T. Durbin (1998). Philosophy of Technology in the Americas in the Last Twenty-Five Years. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):87-95.
Giovanni Sambin & Jan M. Smith (eds.) (1998). Twenty-Five Years of Constructive Type Theory: Proceedings of a Congress Held in Venice, October 1995. Oxford University Press.
M. Cary (1927). The Great War of 431–404 The Great War Between Athens and Sparta. By B. W. Henderson. Pp. Xiv + 517. Macmillan, 1927. 18s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (05):179-180.
J. Bryan Hehir (1992). Just War Theory In A Post-Cold War World. Journal of Religious Ethics 20 (2):237-257.
James Turner Johnson (2002). Paul Ramsey and the Recovery of the Just War Idea. Journal of Military Ethics 1 (2):136-144.
Maurice A. Finocchiaro (2005). Gramsci, the First World War, and the Problem of Politics Vs Religion Vs Economics in War. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4):407-419.
John A. Vasquez (1993). The War Puzzle. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #316,579 of 1,780,278 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,765 of 1,780,278 )
How can I increase my downloads?