David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (2):233-253 (2005)
I attempt in this paper to argue a thesis that is the opposite of the standard reading of Plato’s Symposium. I maintain that it is not the persuasive speech of thecomic or tragic poets that is criticized and undermined in the dialogue, but Socratic dialectic and dialogical argumentation. This is to say, it is not Aristophanes’ and Agathon’s speeches that are the object of Plato’s critique, but Socrates’ minimalist and rather unpoetic elenchos. My anaysis leads to the conclusion that Diotima’s speech is meant to be recognized as Plato’s own invention in order to highlight the abstraction and utter unmusicality of Socratic dialectic
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Amelie Oksenberg Rorty (2008). The Dramatic Sources of Philosophy. Philosophy and Literature 32 (1):pp. 11-30.
Wolfgang Kullmann (2012). Dialectical Methodology: What is Behind the Ti Esti Question? / Vasilis Politis ; Socratic Induction in Plato and Aristotle / Hayden W. Ausland ; Aristotle's Definition of Elenchus in the Light of Plato's Sophist / Louis-Andre Dorion ; The Aristotelian Elenchus / Robert Bolton ; Aristotle's Gradual Turn From Dialectic. In Jakob L. Fink (ed.), The Development of Dialectic From Plato to Aristotle. Cambridge University Press.
Christopher Rowe (2012). Socrates on Reason, Appetite and Passion: A Response to Thomas C. Brickhouse and Nicholas D. Smith, Socratic Moral Psychology. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 16 (3):305-324.
John M. Armstrong (2009). Review of Frisbee C. C. Sheffield, Plato’s Symposium: The Ethics of Desire (Oxford University Press, 2006). [REVIEW] Ancient Philosophy 29 (1):208–212.
Edward J. Grippe (2002). Socrates, Plato and the Tao. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 9 (1):61-70.
Christopher Rowe (2006). The Symposium as a Socratic Dialogue. In J. H. Lesher, Debra Nails & Frisbee C. C. Sheffield (eds.), Plato's Symposium: Issues in Interpretation and Reception. Distributed by Harvard University Press.
Catherine H. Zuckert (2009). Plato's Philosophers: The Coherence of the Dialogues. The University of Chicago Press.
Plato (2009). The Socratic Dialogues. Kaplan Publishing.
Mary P. Nichols (2004). Socrates' Contest with the Poets in Plato's Symposium. Political Theory 32 (2):186-206.
Hallvard Fossheim (2012). Dialectic as Inter-Personal Activity: Self-Refutation and Dialectic in Plato and Aristotle / Luca Castagnoli ; The Role of the Respondent in Plato and Aristotle / Marja-Liisa Kakkuri-Knuuttila ; Division as a Method in Plato. In Jakob L. Fink (ed.), The Development of Dialectic From Plato to Aristotle. Cambridge University Press.
Danielle A. Layne (2009). Refutation and Double Ignorance in Proclus. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (2):347-362.
C. J. Rowe (2007). Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing. Cambridge University Press.
Gabriel Richardson Lear (2006). Permanent Beauty and Becoming Happy in Plato's Symposium. In J. H. Lesher, Debra Nails & Frisbee C. C. Sheffield (eds.), Plato's Symposium: Issues in Interpretation and Reception. Distributed by Harvard University Press. 96.
Jacob Howland (2007). Plato's Dionysian Music?: A Reading of the Symposium. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):17-47.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads14 ( #113,647 of 1,100,819 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #289,727 of 1,100,819 )
How can I increase my downloads?