David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:99-112 (2010)
Political life is and ought to be entirely autonomous from theology; religion belongs to the private sphere and political community is ruled by the sovereign power of the state in accordance with “secular reasons.” This is commonly referred to as the modern settlement over the vexed relationship between politics and religious faith, and many have characterized it as one of the greatest legacies of the Enlightenment. Against this positive assessment, I shall argue that in hisearly De Regno, Thomas Aquinas offers compelling theological and philosophical reasons to doubt the coherence of the modern settlement and its compatibility with Christian tradition. According to this view, political practice must be reinterpreted according to a distinctly Christian understanding of the human person. Political life is not autonomous; rather it essentially requires theological reorientation
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Brian Davies (1993). The Thought of Thomas Aquinas. Clarendon Press.
Michael J. Sweeney (2009). Aquinas on Limits to Political Responsibility for Virtue. Review of Metaphysics 62 (4):819-847.
Gerrit Manenschijn & John Vriend (1997). Jesus Is the Christ": The Political Theology of "Leviathan. Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (1):35-64.
Joseph G. Trabbic (2002). Aquinas and Continental Philosophy of Religion. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:211-228.
Thomas (2002). Political Writings. Cambridge University Press.
Brian Davies (ed.) (2002). Thomas Aquinas: Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Heinrich Meier (2006). Leo Strauss and the Theological-Political Problem. Cambridge University Press.
John I. Jenkins (1997). Knowledge and Faith in Thomas Aquinas. Cambridge University Press.
Tracey Rowland (2009). Augustinian and Thomist Engagements with the World. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (3):441-459.
Nicholas Aroney (2007). Subsidiarity, Federalism and the Best Constitution: Thomas Aquinas on City, Province and Empire. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 26 (2):161-228.
J. L. A. West (2007). The Functioning of Philosophy in Aquinas. Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):383-394.
Daniel Haynes (2011). The Metaphysics of Christian Ethics: Radical Orthodoxy and Theosis. Heythrop Journal 52 (4):659-671.
Thomas Sullivan & Russell Pannier (2001). Getting a Grip on the Philosophies of Thomas Aquinas: A Defense of Systematic Reconstruction. Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):50-60.
J. W. Tate (2013). Dividing Locke From God: The Limits of Theology in Locke's Political Philosophy. Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (2):133-164.
Thomas (1953). The Political Ideas of St. Thomas Aquinas. New York, Hafner Pub. Co..
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads7 ( #439,779 of 1,911,401 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #319,111 of 1,911,401 )
How can I increase my downloads?