David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This paper argues for a rehabilitation of philosophical engagement with the question of whether revolution can be justified. Such a renewed engagement with the problem of revolution appears to be stymied by the intuition that we have strong moral arguments ruling out revolution in almost every case. I aim to show that we should abandon this intuition. I will argue that standard arguments against revolution are not strong enough to warrant the relative inattention the question of the justifiability revolution has recently suffered, especially given the emergence of new potential justifications for revolution (appeals to principles of distributive justice, appeals to the international human rights regime) and the subtle but important shifts that we ought to make in our conceptions of sovereignty and revolution. Accordingly, this paper sketches six forms of argument against the justifiability of revolution. I assess each form of argument and I conclude that none of them are strong enough to makes further philosophical inquiry into the justification of revolution pointless.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Margaret J. Osler (ed.) (2000). Rethinking the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge University Press.
Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2008). Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution. Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.
Brett Calcott (2008). Assessing the Fitness Landscape Revolution. Biology and Philosophy 23 (5):639-657.
Chris W. Surprenant (2010). Minority Oppression and Justified Revolution. Journal of Social Philosophy 41 (4):442-453.
Kai Nielsen (1971). On the Choice Between Reform and Revolution. Inquiry 14 (1-4):271 – 295.
Krystyna Gorniak-Kocikowska (1996). The Computer Revolution and the Problem of Global Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (2):177-190.
Chris W. Surprenant (2010). Kant's Contribution to Moral Education: The Relevance of Catechistics. Journal of Moral Education 39 (2):165-174.
Angelica Nuzzo (2011). Arbitrariness and Freedom: Hegel on Rousseau and Revolution,” In: Rousseau and Revolution, Ed. R. Lauristen, M. Thorup, London, Continuum, 2011, 64-82. [REVIEW] In M. Lauristen (ed.), Rousseau and Revolution. Continuum.
F. A. Muller (2011). Reflections on the Revolution at Stanford. Synthese 183 (1):87-114.
Chris W. Surprenant (2005). A Reconciliation of Kant's Views on Revolution. Interpretation 32 (2):151-169.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #70,330 of 1,139,863 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #165,020 of 1,139,863 )
How can I increase my downloads?