David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In The Mystery of Capital and the Construction of Social Reality. Open Court 35-51 (2008)
Consider a game of blind chess between two chess masters that is recorded in some standard chess notation. The recording is a representation of the game. But what is the game itself? This question is, we believe, central to the entire domain of social ontology. We argue that the recorded game is a special sort of quasi-abstract pattern, something that is: (i) like abstract entities such as numbers or forms, in that it is both nonphysical and nonpsychological; but at the same time, (ii) through its association with specific players and a specific occasion, tied to time and history. We discover other abstract patterns of this sort especially in the domains of law and commerce. This essay draws on the work in social ontology, we of Hernando de Soto and of John Searle to develop an ontology of the social world based on an analysis of the peculiar interdependence between quasi-abstract patterns and their representations in documents of different sorts.
|Keywords||capitalism documents free-standing Y terms chess document acts|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Barry Smith (2012). How to Do Things with Documents. Rivista di Estetica 50 (50):179-198.
Molly Brigid Flynn (2012). A Realer Institutional Reality: Deepening Searle's (De)Ontology of Civilization. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (1):43-67.
Italo Testa (2011). Social Space and the Ontology of Recognition. In Heikki Ikäheimo Arto Laitinen (ed.), Recognition and Social Ontology. Brill Books (Pp. 287-308)
Andrius Galisanka (2012). Making Social Worlds. Journal of the Philosophy of History 6 (1):115-133.
Laurence Kaufmann (2005). Self-in-a-Vat: On John Searle's Ontology of Reasons for Acting. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (4):447-479.
Jan G. Michel, Dirk Franken & Attila Karakus (eds.) (2010). John R. Searle: Thinking About the Real World. Ontos/de Gruyter.
Stuart Rachels (2008). The Reviled Art. In Benjamin Hale (ed.), Philosophy Looks at Chess. Open Court Press
Elijah Weber (2012). Context-Dependence in Searle's Impossibility Argument: A Reply to Butchard and D'Amico. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):433-444.
Savas L. Tsohatzidis (2007). Searle's Derivation of Promissory Obligation. In Intentional Acts and Insitutional Facts: Essays on John Searle's Social Ontology. Springer
Michael Corsten (1998). Review Symposium on Searle : John Searle, the Construction of Social Reality. Free Press, New York, 1995. Pp. 241. $25. I. Between Constructivism and Realism—Searle's Theory of the Construction of Social Reality. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (1):102-121.
N. Fotion (2000). John Searle. Princeton University Press.
Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.) (2007). Intentional Acts and Institutional Facts: Essays on John Searle's Social Ontology. Springer.
Colin Danby (2004). Lupita's Dress: Care in Time. Hypatia 19 (4):23-48.
Added to index2012-11-25
Total downloads76 ( #62,497 of 1,940,986 )
Recent downloads (6 months)21 ( #27,508 of 1,940,986 )
How can I increase my downloads?