David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 157 (1):129 - 139 (2007)
Crispin Wright champions the notion of superassertibility as providing a truth predicate that is congenial to antirealists in many debates in that it satisfies relevant platitudes concerning truth and does so in a very minimal way. He motivates such a claim by arguing that superassertibility can satisfy the equivalence schema: it is superassertible that P if and only if P. I argue that Wright’s attempted proof that superassertibility can satisfy this schema is unsuccessful, because it requires a premise that has not been properly motivated and is prima facie implausible. I further argue that, even if the dubious premise is accepted, the resulting proof is intuitionistically invalid. This is problematic, because a proponent of superassertibility as a truth predicate has independent reasons to affect a logical revision in the direction of intuitionism. The resulting dilemma suggests that superassertibility may not be an adequate truth candidate for any significant ranges of discourse.
|Keywords||Antirealism Crispin Wright Equivalence Schema Intuitionistic logic Minimal truth Realism Superassertibility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
David Bell & W. D. Hart (1979). The Epistemology of Abstract Objects: Access and Inference. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 53:153-165.
Michael A. E. Dummett (1991). The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. Harvard University Press.
Michael A. E. Dummett (1993). The Seas of Language. Oxford University Press.
Frederic B. Fitch (1963). A Logical Analysis of Some Value Concepts. Journal of Symbolic Logic 28 (2):135-142.
W. D. Hart & Colin McGinn (1976). Knowledge and Necessity. Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (2):205 - 208.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Deborah C. Smith (2011). Mind-Independence and the Logical Space of Wright's Realist-Relevant Axes. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):164-191.
Panu Raatikainen (2005). On Horwich's Way Out. Analysis 65 (287):175-177.
Jonathan L. Kvanvig (1999). ``Truth and Superassertibility&Quot. Philosophical Studies 93:1-19.
Jason Holt (1999). Superassertibility and Asymptotic Truth. Dialogue 38 (01):109-.
J. L. Kvanvig (1999). Truth and Superassertibility. Philosophical Studies 93 (1):1-19.
María Ponte Azcárate (2007). A Proposal for a Non-Realist Theory of Truth. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:105-109.
Luca Moretti (2007). A Thick Realist Consequence of Wright's Minimalism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (1):24–38.
Paul Tomassi (2006). Truth, Warrant and Superassertibility. Synthese 148 (1):31 - 56.
Jim Edwards (1996). Anti-Realist Truth and Concepts of Superassertibility. Synthese 109 (1):103 - 120.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #95,283 of 1,089,064 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,801 of 1,089,064 )
How can I increase my downloads?