The Argument from Meaning to God In Buber's I and Thou
International Philosophical Quarterly 27 (4):347-363 (1987)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMartin Buber (1970). I and Thou. New York,Scribner.
Michael Berman (2013). The Thought Space of God: The Haunting Below the I-Thou Relation. Heythrop Journal 54 (1):70-76.
Martin Buber (1966). The Way of Response: Martin Buber. New York, Schocken Books.
James W. Heisig (2000). Non-I and Thou: Nishida, Buber, and the Moral Consequences of Self-Actualization. Philosophy East and West 50 (2):179-207.
Martin Kavka (2012). Verification (Bewahrung) in Martin Buber. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 20 (1):71-98.
Alexander Sissel Kohanski (1975). An Analytical Interpretation of Martin Buber's I and Thou. Woodbury, N.Y.,Barron's Educational Series, Inc..
R. Melvin Keiser (2009). But Bill . . . ? Tradition and Discovery 36 (2):43-49.
W. J. Morgan & Alexandre Guilherme (2012). I and Thou: The Educational Lessons of Martin Buber's Dialogue with the Conflicts of His Times. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (9):979-996.
L. M. M. (1981). Buber's Way to I and Thou. The Review of Metaphysics 34 (3):612-613.
Helen Wodehouse (1945). Martin Buber's 'I and Thou'. Philosophy 20 (75):17-.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-12-02Total downloads1 ( #274,652 of 549,065 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,065 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
