David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Jean Petitot (ed.), Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press 317--329 (1999)
Abstract The paper uses the tools of mereotopology (the theory of parts, wholes and boundaries) to work out the implications of certain analogies between the 'ecological psychology' of J. J Gibson and the phenomenology of Edmund Husserl. It presents an ontological theory of spatial boundaries and of spatially extended entities. By reference to examples from the geographical sphere it is shown that both boundaries and extended entities fall into two broad categories: those which exist independently of our cognitive acts (for example, the planet Earth, its exterior surface); and those which exist only in virtue of such acts (for example: the equator, the North Sea). The visual field, too, can be conceived as an example of an extended entity that is dependent in the sense at issue. The paper suggests extending this analogy by postulating entities which would stand to true judgments as the visual field stands to acts of visual perception. The judgment field is defined more precisely as that complex extended entity which comprehends all entities which are relevant to the truth of a given (true) judgment. The work of cognitive linguists such as Talmy and Langacker, when properly interpreted, can be shown to yield a detailed account of the structures of the judgment fields corresponding to sentences of different sorts. A new sort of correspondence-theoretic definition of truth for sentences of natural language can then be formulated on this basis
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Juan C. González (2013). Interactive Fiat Objects. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (2):205-217.
Anselmo Caputo (2008). The “Ecological” Approach to Ontology in Hedwig Conrad-Martius and in Some Authors of the Phenomenological School. Axiomathes 18 (4):475-489.
Mark Paterson (2005). The Forgetting of Touch. Angelaki 10 (3):115 – 132.
Similar books and articles
Bradley Dowden, Truth. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Giovanni Bruno Vicario (2002). On Simultaneous Masking in the Visual Field. Axiomathes 13 (3/4):399-432.
Giovanni Bruno Vicario (2003). On Simultaneous Masking in the Visual Field. Axiomathes 13 (3-4):399-432.
A. C. Lloyd (1957). The Visual Field and Perception, Part II. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 125:125-144.
David W. Hamlyn (1957). The Visual Field and Perception, Part I. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107:107-124.
Barry Smith (1995). On Drawing Lines on a Map. Spatial Information Theory:475–484.
M. Chirimuuta & I. Gold (2009). The Embedded Neuron, the Enactive Field? In John Bickle (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience. Oxford University Press
Austen Clark (1996). Three Varieties of Visual Field. Philosophical Psychology 9 (4):477-95.
Louise Richardson (2010). Seeing Empty Space. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):227-243.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads53 ( #84,386 of 1,934,791 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #146,211 of 1,934,791 )
How can I increase my downloads?