David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 36 (3):225 – 254 (1993)
What are we to make of the cogito (cogito ergo sum) today, as the walls of Cartesian philosophy crumble around us? The enduring foundation of the cogito is consciousness. It is in virtue of a particular phenomenological structure that an experience is conscious rather than unconscious. Drawing on an analysis of that structure, the cogito is given a new explication that synthesizes phenomenological, epistemological, logical, and ontological elements. What, then, is the structure of conscious thinking on which the cogito draws? What kind of certainty does the experience of thinking give one about one's thinking and about one's existence? What form of inference is the cogito, and what is the source of its validity and soundness? Does the cogito itself lead to an ontology of mind and body like Descartes's dualism? The discussion begins with Descartes's own careful formulations of some of these issues. Then the cogito is parsed into several different principles, the phenomenological principle emerging as basic. In due course the analysis sifts through Husserl's epistemology, Hintikka's logic (or pragmatics) of the cogito, and Kaplan's logic of demonstratives, as these bear specifically on the cogito
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Nagel (1986). The View From Nowhere. Oxford University Press.
Gilbert Ryle (1949). The Concept of Mind. Hutchinson and Co.
David Kaplan (1989). Demonstratives. In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press 481-563.
Jean-Paul Sartre (1956). Being and Nothingness. Distributed by Random House.
Jaakko Hintikka (1962). Knowledge and Belief. Ithaca, N.Y.,Cornell University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Jim Hanson (2005). Searching for the High-I. Asian Philosophy 15 (3):247 – 264.
Similar books and articles
Peter Slezak (2010). Doubts About Indubitability. Philosophical Forum 41 (4):389-412.
Christopher Ormell (1993). A Modern Cogito 3: Unpredictability and the Other. Cogito 7 (2):140-145.
Joseph Almog (2008). Cogito?: Descartes and Thinking the World. Oxford University Press.
Peter Slezak (2010). Doubts About Descartes' Indubitability: The Cogito as Intuition and Inference. Philosophical Forum 41 (4):389-412.
Weimin Mo (2007). Cogito : From Descartes to Sartre. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (2):247-264.
Rainer Trapp (1988). » Credo* Me* Cogitare Ergo Scio* Me* Esse1/2 « — Descartes' »Cogito Ergo Sum« Reinterpreted. Erkenntnis 28 (2):253 - 267.
Paul Ricoeur (1996). The Crisis of the Cogito. Synthese 106 (1):57 - 66.
Jerrold J. Katz (1986). Cogitations: A Study of the Cogito in Relation to the Philosophy of Logic and Language and a Study of Them in Relation to the Cogito. Oxford University Press.
William J. Rapaport (1976). On Cogito Propositions. Philosophical Studies 29 (1):63-68.
Jonathan Harrison (1984). The Incorrigibility of the Cogito. Mind 93 (July):321-335.
Added to index2009-01-30
Total downloads27 ( #152,462 of 1,934,371 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #145,866 of 1,934,371 )
How can I increase my downloads?