Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):529-530 (2002)
|Abstract||The target article adopts an adaptationist research strategy that, while logically coherent, suffers from various limitations, including problems in reconstructing past selective environments, ambiguity in how narrowly to define adaptive problems or selection pressures, and an overemphasis on specialization in evolved psychological mechanisms. To remedy these problems, I support a more flexible approach involving phenotypic adaptation and cultural evolution.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
J. G. Ollason (1991). What is This Stuff Called Fitness? Biology and Philosophy 6 (1):81-92.
Massimo Pigliucci (2005). Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity: Where Are We Going Now? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20 (9):481-486.
M. D. Rutherford (2002). It's Adaptations All the Way Down. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):526-526.
Massimo Pigliucci (2003). Phenotypic Integration: Studying the Ecology and Evolution of Complex Phenotypes. Ecology Letters 6:265-272.
Masatoshi Nei (2007). The New Mutation Theory of Phenotypic Evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 (30):12335-12242.
Matthew Rellihan (2012). Adaptationism and Adaptive Thinking in Evolutionary Psychology. Philosophical Psychology 25 (2):245-277.
Ben Fraser (2010). Adaptation, Exaptation, By-Products and Spandrels in Evolutionary Explanations of Morality. Biological Theory 5 (3):223-227.
Daniel G. Blackburn (2002). Use of Phylogenetic Analysis to Distinguish Adaptation From Exaptation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):507-508.
Nicholas S. Thompson (2002). Adaptation for, Exaptation As. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):531-532.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #232,211 of 548,972 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?