The Logical Structure of the Debate About McTaggart's Paradox

Philosophy Research Archives 14:371-379 (1988)
Abstract This short article aims to illustrate the mutually question-begging arguments that are often presented in debates between opponents and defenderss of McTaggart’s “proof” that A-properties (pastness, presentness and futurity) are logically incoherent. A sample of such arguments is taken from a recent debate between L. Nathan Oaklander (a defender of McTaggart) and myself (an opponent of McTaggart) and a method of escaping the impasse that is often reached in such debates is suggested
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,705
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Cheng-Chih Tsai (2011). A Token-Based Semantic Analysis of McTaggart's Paradox. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 10:107-124.
    Josh Parsons (2002). A-Theory for B-Theorists. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (206):1-20.
    Heather Dyke (2001). The Pervasive Paradox of Tense. Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):103-124.
    William Seager (1999). The Reality of Now. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):69 – 82.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-12-02

    Total downloads

    5 ( #160,483 of 549,511 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,397 of 549,511 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums