David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Historical Materialism 4 (1):215-240 (1999)
In his recent work The Myth of Dialectics John Rosenthal presents a forceful polemic against Hegel and Marxists sympathetic to the Hegelian legacy. The methodology Hegel employed, his metaphysical assertions, his rejection of the principles of formal logic, and the political implications of his standpoint, are all fundamentally incompatible with Marx’s perspective, according to Rosenthal. While Rosenthal grants that Marx did make use of Hegelian motifs in his theory of value, even this is not to Hegel’s credit: the very perversity of Hegel’s thought made it useful for the comprehension of the perversity of capital. In this paper I argue that a close and reasonably charitable reading of Hegel’s Logic reveals a quite different picture of his methodology and ontological commitments from that presented by Rosenthal. While there are profound substantive differences between the Hegelian and Marxian 1 perspectives on capitalist society, it is not the case that Hegel’s Logic is homologous with capital. The Logic provides helpful conceptual resources for a critique of capital. In the final section of the paper five areas are briefly sketched in which Hegelian dialectical logic remains of contemporary interest.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Peter Button (2007). Negativity and Dialectical Materialism: Zhang Shiying's Reading of Hegel's Dialectical Logic. Philosophy East and West 57 (1):63-82.
Tony Smith (2000). On Rosenthal's "Escape" From Hegel. Science and Society 64 (4):489 - 496.
Thomas T. Sekine (2008). The Dialectic of Capital : An Unoist Interpretation. In Bertell Ollman & Tony Smith (eds.), Science and Society. Palgrave Macmillan. 434 - 445.
Tony Smith (2003). On the Homology Thesis. Historical Materialism 11 (1):185-194.
Tony Smith (1990). The Logic of Marx's Capital: Replies to Hegelian Criticisms. State University of New York Press.
John Rosenthal (1999). The Escape From Hegel. Science and Society 63 (3):283 - 309.
John L. Stanley (1997). Marx's Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Nature. Science and Society 61 (4):449 - 473.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #65,443 of 1,692,603 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #32,612 of 1,692,603 )
How can I increase my downloads?