The syntax and interpretation of temporal expressions in English

Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (1):43 - 99 (1978)
The only obligatory temporal expression in English is tense, yet Hans Reichenbach (1947) has argued convincingly that the simplest sentence is understood in terms of three temporal notions. Additional possibilities for a simple sentence are limited: English sentences have one time adverbial each. It is not immediately clear how to resolve these matters, that is, how (if at all) Reichenbach's account can be reconciled with the facts of English. This paper attempts to show that they can be reconciled, and presents an analysis of temporal specification that is based directly on Reichenbach's account.Part I is devoted to a study of the way the three times—speech time, reference time, event time—are realized and interpreted. The relevant syntactic structures and their interaction and interpretation are examined in detail. Part II discusses how a grammar should deal with time specification, and proposes a set of interpretive rules. The study offers an analysis of simple sentences, sentences with complements, and habitual sentences. It is shown that tense and adverbials function differently, depending on the structure in which they appear. The temporal system is relational: the orientation and values of temporal expressions are not fixed, but their relational values are consistent. This consistency allows the statement of principles of interpretation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00365130
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,570
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
James D. McCawley (1971). Tense and Time Reference in English. In Charles J. Fillmore & D. Terence Langėndoen (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics. Irvington 96--113.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Barbara H. Partes (1984). Nominal and Temporal Anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 7 (3):243--286.
Mikhail Kissine (2008). Why Will is Not a Modal. Natural Language Semantics 16 (2):129-155.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

66 ( #69,204 of 1,938,538 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

12 ( #45,406 of 1,938,538 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.