David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Noûs 16 (May):181-208 (1982)
"This is a sea urchin", I declare while strolling the beach with a friend. What do I refer to by uttering the demonstrative pronoun "this"? The object immediately before me, of course. As it happens on this occasion, the object in the sand at my feet. I may point at it to aid my hearer - or I may not. BUt now , if the meaning of the term is distinguished from the referent, what is the meaning of this, or of my utterance of this? I think we can distinguish the meaning of this, or of its utterance, from its referent. And if we attend carefully to what meanings should be, we can see just what ,after all, is the meaning of this.
|Keywords||Acquaintance Demonstratives Language Referring Frege Husserl|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
David Woodruff Smith (1984). Content and Context of Perception. Synthese 61 (October):61-88.
David Woodruff Smith (1983). Is This a Dagger I See Before Me? Synthese 54 (January):95-114.
Lawrence D. Roberts (1986). The Figure-Ground Model for the Explanation of the Determination of Indexical Reference. Synthese 68 (3):441 - 486.
Lawrence Roberts (1984). Russell on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Indexicals. Philosophia 14 (1-2):111-127.
David Woodruff Smith (1983). Kantifying In. Synthese 54 (2):261 - 273.
Similar books and articles
Marina Paola Banchetti-Robino (1997). Husserl's Theory of Language as Calculus Ratiocinator. Synthese 112 (3):303-321.
David Woodruff Smith (1989). The Circle of Acquaintaince. Cambridge University Press.
David Woodruff Smith & Ronald McIntyre (1971). Intentionality Via Intensions. Journal of Philosophy 68 (September):541-560.
Ernest Lepore & Kirk Ludwig (2000). The Semantics and Pragmatics of Complex Demonstratives. Mind 109 (434):199-240.
Kirk Ludwig (2000). The Semantics and Pragmatics of Complex Demonstratives. Mind 109 (434):199 - 240.
Hans Ruin (2011). Seeing Meaning: Frege and Derrida on Ideality and the Limits of Husserlian Intuitionism. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 27 (1):63-81.
Jeffrey C. King (2008). Complex Demonstratives as Quantifiers: Objections and Replies. Philosophical Studies 141 (2):209 - 242.
Mark Textor (2007). Frege's Theory of Hybrid Proper Names Developed and Defended. Mind 116 (464):947-982.
Richard Heck (2002). Do Demonstratives Have Senses? Philosophers' Imprint 2 (2):1-33.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads141 ( #16,547 of 1,725,989 )
Recent downloads (6 months)110 ( #10,094 of 1,725,989 )
How can I increase my downloads?