Devil Simulation: Why we Couldn't, Shouldn't, and Wouldn't
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In this paper I critically evaluate the Devil Simulation Argument for cognitive immoralism—the position that moral flaws with a work of art can be cognitively virtuous, and thereby artistically valuable. I focus on Matthew Kieran's version of the argument. Kieran holds that by simulating the attitudes of fictional devils we can come to gain important moral insights. In response, I argue that we have no reason to believe that we can effectively adopt immoral attitudes, that any successful narrative artworks ask us to do so, or that it would be an effective means of moral instructions.
|Keywords||immoralism art and morality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Matthew Kieran (2003). Forbidding Knowledge: The Challenge of Immoralism. In Jose Luis Bermudez & Sebastian Gardner (eds.), Art and Morality. Routledge.
Andrea Sauchelli (2012). Ethicism and Immoral Cognitivism: Gaut Versus Kieran on Art and Morality. Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (3):107-118.
Aaron Smuts (2009). Do Moral Flaws Enhance Amusement? American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2):151-163.
Johan E. Gustafsson & Martin Peterson (2012). A Computer Simulation of the Argument From Disagreement. Synthese 184 (3):387–405.
Matthew Kieran (2006). Art, Morality and Ethics: On the (Im)Moral Character of Art Works and Inter-Relations to Artistic Value. Philosophy Compass 1 (2):129–143.
Robert Stecker (2008). Immoralism and the Anti-Theoretical View. British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2):145-161.
Aaron Smuts (2011). Grounding Moralism: Moral Flaws and Aesthetic Properties. Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (4):34-53.
Matthew Kieran (2003). Art and Morality. In Jerrold Levinson (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford. 451--470.
Aaron Smuts (2013). The Salacious and the Satirical: In Defense of Symmetric Comic Moralism. Journal of Aesthetic Education 47 (4):45-62.
Ron Sun & Isaac Naveh (2007). Social Institution, Cognition, and Survival: A Cognitive–Social Simulation. Mind and Society 6 (2):115-142.
Alessandro Giovannelli (2007). The Ethical Criticism of Art: A New Mapping of the Territory. Philosophia 35 (2):117-127.
A. W. Eaton (2012). Robust Immoralism. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (3):281-292.
Matthew W. Parker (2009). Computing the Uncomputable; or, the Discrete Charm of Second-Order Simulacra. Synthese 169 (3):447 - 463.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-11-12
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?