David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 23 (46):78-95 (2014)
Is cinematicity a virtue in film? Is lack of cinematicity a defect? Berys Gaut thinks so. He claims that cinematicity is a pro tanto virtue in film. I disagree. I argue that the term “cinematic” principally refers to some cluster of characteristics found in films featuring the following: expansive scenery, extreme depth of field, high camera positioning, and elaborate tracking shots. We often use the word as a term of praise. And we are likely right to do so. We are right if we mean that the film does well what movies often do well. We are wrong if we mean that the film is good for doing what is merely distinctive of film. This issue has important implications for understanding the role of the medium in artistic evaluation. I argue that we should reject Gaut’s claim because it entails an implausibly strong medium specificity thesis
|Keywords||Cinematic, medium specificity, philosophy of film, distinctiveness, artistic value, Berys Gaut, Noël Carroll|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paisley Livingston (2008). Recent Work on Cinema as Philosophy. Philosophy Compass 3 (4):590-603.
T. Ponech (2012). Berys Gaut's A Philosophy of Cinematic Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (2):187-190.
Katherine Thomson-Jones (2011). A Philosophy of Cinematic Art – Berys Gaut. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (243):445-446.
Berys Gaut (2004). The Philosophy of the Movies : Cinematic Narration. In Peter Kivy (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics. Blackwell Pub. 230--253.
Robert Sinnerbrink (2011). New Philosophies of Film: Thinking Images. Continuum International Pub. Group.
Jinhee Choi (2011). A Philosophy of Cinematic Art by Gaut, Berys. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 69 (2):235-237.
Katherine Thomson-Jones (2009). Cinematic Narrators. Philosophy Compass 4 (2):296-311.
Katherine Thomson-Jones (2007). The Literary Origins of the Cinematic Narrator. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (1):76-94.
Trevor Whittock (1990). Metaphor and Film. Cambridge University Press.
Berys Gaut (2002). Cinematic Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (4):299–312.
Allan Casebier (1991). Film and Phenomenology: Toward a Realist Theory of Cinematic Representation. Cambridge University Press.
Robert Sinnerbrink (2012). Cinematic Belief. Angelaki 17 (4):95 - 117.
Greg Hainge, To Have Done with the Perspective of the Body: Gaspar Noe´’s Enter the Void, Somatic Film Theory and the Biocinematic Imaginary‘.
Carl Plantinga (2010). Review of Berys Gaut, A Philosophy of Cinematic Art. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (7).
Steven Shaviro (1993). The Cinematic Body. University of Minnesota Press.
Added to index2011-10-07
Total downloads56 ( #74,058 of 1,792,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #207,320 of 1,792,864 )
How can I increase my downloads?