David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In The Continuum Companion to Aesthetics. Continuum (2012)
The common assumption is that works of popular are less serious, less artistically valuable. Popular art is driven by a profit motive; real art, high art, is produced for loftier goals, such as aesthetic appreciation. Further, popular art is formulaic and gravitates toward the lowest common denominator. High art is innovative. It enriches, elevates, and inspires; popular art just entertains. Worse, popular art inculcates cultural biases. It is a corporate tool of ideological indoctrination, making contingent social and economic arrangements seem necessary. Or so the common view holds. In light of these common assumptions, we must ask just what marks the distinction between high art and popular art? Is there really any important difference at all? Is there reason to think that popular is by its very nature aesthetically inferior to high art? In this article, I consider some of the prominent answers to these questions. The discussion is organized around questions concerning two general topics: (1) the nature of popular art, and (2) the putative aesthetic deficiencies of popular art.
|Keywords||popular art aesthetics aesthetics value high vs low|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard Shusterman (2003). Entertainment: A Question for Aesthetics. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (3):289-307.
David Carrier (2011). The Star as Icon: Celebrity in the Age of Mass Consumption (Review). Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (2):117-119.
Robin James (2011). Feminist Aesthetics, Popular Music, and the Politics of the 'Mainstream'. In L. Ryan Musgrave (ed.), Feminist Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art. Springer
Noël Carroll (2001). Beyond Aesthetics: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Roger Taylor (1978). Art, an Enemy of the People. Harvester Press.
Theodore Gracyk (2007). Searching for the 'Popular' and the 'Art' of Popular Art. Philosophy Compass 2 (3):380–395.
Donald Kuspit (1995). Art and Capital: An Ironic Dialectic. Critical Review 9 (4):465-482.
David Novitz (1989). Ways of Artmaking: The High and the Popular in Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 29 (3):213-229.
Stefán Snævarr (2007). Pragmatism and Popular Culture: Shusterman, Popular Art, and the Challenge of Visuality. Journal of Aesthetic Education 41 (4):1-11.
Kathleen Kadon Desmond (2011). Ideas About Art. Wiley-Blackwell.
Paul Duncum & Ted Bracey (eds.) (2001). On Knowing: Art and Visual Culture. Canterbury University Press.
Leora Farber (ed.) (2009). Imaging Ourselves: Visual Identities in Representation. University of Johannesburg, Faculty of Art Design and Architecture.
Lars Aagaard-Mogensen (ed.) (1976). Culture and Art: An Anthology. Humanities Press.
Added to index2011-06-01
Total downloads44 ( #75,821 of 1,725,413 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #110,403 of 1,725,413 )
How can I increase my downloads?