The Desire-Frustration Theory of Suspense
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (3):281-291 (2008)
| Abstract | What is suspense and how is it created? An answer to this question constitutes a theory of suspense. I propose that any theory of suspense needs to be able to account for three curious features: (1) Suspense is seldom felt in our daily lives, but frequently felt in response to works of fiction and other narrative artworks. [Narrative Imbalance] (2) It is widely thought that suspense requires uncertainty, but we often feel suspense in response to narratives when we have knowledge of the outcome. [Paradox of Suspense] (3) The amount of suspense felt in response to a narrative typically diminishes on repeated encounters. [Diminishing Returns] I offer a theory of suspense that can explain these three features. I argue for a theory called the Desire-Frustration Theory of Suspense, which holds that suspense results when our desire to effect the outcome of an imminent event is frustrated. | |||||||||
| Keywords | suspense paradox of suspense art and emotion | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDonald Beecher (2007). Suspense. Philosophy and Literature 31 (2):255-279.
Robert J. Yanal (1996). The Paradox of Suspense. British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (2):146-158.
Richard J. Gerrig (1997). Is There a Paradox of Suspense? A Reply to Yanal. British Journal of Aesthetics 37 (2):168-174.
Ferrari (1999). Aristotle's Literary Aesthetics. Phronesis 44 (3):181-198.
G. R. F. Ferrari (1999). Aristotle's Literary Aesthetics. Phronesis 44 (3):181 - 198.
Aaron Smuts & Jonathan Frome (2004). Helpless Spectators: Suspense in Videogames and Film. Text Technology 1 (1):13-34.
Christy Mag Uidhir (2011). An Eliminativist Theory of Suspense. Philosophy and Literature 35 (1):121-133.
Aaron Smuts (2009). The Paradox of Suspense. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2009 (6.1):1-15.
Christy Mag Uidhir (2011). The Paradox of Suspense Realism. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 69 (2):161-171.
John Henderson (1998). Virgil's Third Eclogue: How Do You Keep an Idiot in Suspense? The Classical Quarterly 48 (01):213-.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-04-20Total downloads51 ( #21,002 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,489 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
