Graduate studies at Western
Social Epistemology 5 (1):78 – 87 (1991)
|Abstract||Abstract The US Constitution states that the primary objective for the regulation of intellectual property is the ?promotion of science and the useful arts?. This objective is too narrow to permit an appreciation of how intellectual property protections are used by inventors, researchers, and engineers|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
James Wilson (2010). Ontology and the Regulation of Intellectual Property. The Monist 93 (3):450-463.
Francis Gurry (2005). The Growing Complexity of International Policy in Intellectual Property. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):13-20.
Lisa Geller (2010). Data Management in Academic Settings: An Intellectual Property Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):769-775.
Simon Butt & Timothy Lindsey, Trips, Intellectual Property Law Reform in Indonesia: Why Injunctions Aren't Stopping Piracy.
Peter Lewin (2007). Creativity or Coercion: Alternative Perspectives on Rights to Intellectual Property. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 71 (4):441 - 455.
D. B. Resnik (2003). A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property. Journal of Business Ethics 46 (4):319 - 335.
Added to index2009-02-04
Total downloads9 ( #122,589 of 740,802 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,957 of 740,802 )
How can I increase my downloads?