The uses and justifications for the regulation of intellectual property
Social Epistemology 5 (1):78 – 87 (1991)
| Abstract | Abstract The US Constitution states that the primary objective for the regulation of intellectual property is the ?promotion of science and the useful arts?. This objective is too narrow to permit an appreciation of how intellectual property protections are used by inventors, researchers, and engineers | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPeter Lewin (2007). Creativity or Coercion: Alternative Perspectives on Rights to Intellectual Property. Journal of Business Ethics 71 (4):441 - 455.
Lisa Geller (2010). Data Management in Academic Settings: An Intellectual Property Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):769-775.
Francis Gurry (2005). The Growing Complexity of International Policy in Intellectual Property. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1).
James Wilson (2010). Ontology and the Regulation of Intellectual Property. The Monist 93 (3):450-463.
D. B. Resnik (2003). A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property. Journal of Business Ethics 46 (4):319 - 335.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-02-04Total downloads9 ( #113,901 of 548,976 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,976 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
