David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
NTM International Journal of History and Ethics of Natural Sciences, Technology and Medicine 2 (1):65-75 (1994)
Reasoning by analogy in chemical history: fallacies and guidelines. In chemistry (and natural science in general) reasoning in terms of analogy may be of great practical values as well as of theoretical significance. At the same time, however, the use of analogy is risky and the results are uncertain. In alchemy and iatrochemistry analogies between the living and the non-living nature have been carried too far. At the end of the 19th century an analogy was drawn between chemical phenomena and the Darwinian theory of evolution. Another example of an overexaggerated analogy can be found in Lavoisierâs theory of acids, where oxygen was considered to be the general principle of acidity. Reasoning by analogy is mostly based on an inner conviction. It leads to provisional predictions in such cases where the required facts are not or incompletely at our disposal
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul F. A. Bartha (2010). By Parallel Reasoning: The Construction and Evaluation of Analogical Arguments. Oxford University Press.
Allen MacNeill, TIDAC: Identity, Analogy, and Logical Argument in Science. The Evolution List.
Jiri Syrovatka (2000). Analogy and Understanding. Theoria 15 (3):435-450.
Lindley Darden (1982). Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy of Science: Reasoning by Analogy in Theory Construction. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:147 - 165.
Michael J. Wreen (2007). A Second Form of Argument From Analogy. Theoria 73 (3):221-239.
Joshua P. Hochschild (2005). The Rest of Cajetan's Analogy Theory. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):341-356.
Ryan J. Hay (2013). Hybrid Expressivism and the Analogy Between Pejoratives and Moral Language. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):450-474.
Theo A. F. Kuipers (1984). Inductive Analogy in Carnapian Spirit. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:157 - 167.
Ralph M. McInerny (1961). The Logic of Analogy. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff.
Viktor A. Kritsman (1996). Chemical Kinetics as Part of Physical Chemistry in the XIXth Century and at the Beginning of the XXth Century: Analysis of the Origin and Development of Phenomenological Kinetics. NTM International Journal of History and Ethics of Natural Sciences, Technology and Medicine 4 (1):19-30.
Eliyahu White (1999). Talk About God, and Others: (Approaches to Likeness in Certain Western Theological and Philosophical Systems): A Process Metaphysics of Analogy Introduced Historically: (By Way of Regard Especially to Attempted Syntheses of Bible and Hellenism). S.N..
Roger M. White (2009). Talking About God: The Concept of Analogy and the Problem of Religious Language. Ashgate Pub. Ltd..
Joshua P. Hochschild (2003). Did Aquinas Answer Cajetan's Question? Aquinas's Semantic Rules for Analogy and the Interpretation of De Nominum Analogia. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:273-288.
Raimo Tuomela (1980). Analogy and Distance. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 11 (2):276-291.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-01
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?