Codes of ethics in Hong Kong: Their adoption and impact in the run up to the 1997 transition of sovereignty to china [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 22 (4):281 - 309 (1999)
Following a government campaign run by the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) in 1994, many Hong Kong companies and trade associations adopted written codes of conduct. The research study reported here examines how and why companies responded, and assesses the impact of code adoption on the moral climate of code adopters. The research involved (a) initial questionnaire surveys to which 184 organisations replied, (b) longitudinal questionnaire-based assessments of moral ethos and conduct in a focal sample of 17 code adopting companies, (c) interviews with 33 managers in the focal companies examining the adoption and impact of the codes, and (d) content analysis of 41 company codes of conduct, including those of most focal companies, plus the ICAC model code.While a mixture of prudential and altruistic reasons were given for code adoption, content analysis suggested that the prime motive was corporate self-defence. The prevailing themes were bribery, conflict of interest, insider information, gambling, moonlighting, accuracy of records and misuse of corporate assets. Wider social responsibility tended to be neglected. Companies appeared to have imposed their codes top-down, emphasising disciplinary procedures rather than ethics training, and appointing neither ethics counsellors nor ombuds-people. The longitudinal study over a seven month period suggested that while moral ethos may have declined, overall standards of perceived conduct had not changed.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nien-hê Hsieh (2006). Voluntary Codes of Conduct for Multinational Corporations: Coordinating Duties of Rescue and Justice. Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (2):119-136.
Ennio Lugli, Ulpiana Kocollari & Chiara Nigrisoli (2009). The Codes of Ethics of S&P/MIB Italian Companies: An Investigation of Their Contents and the Main Factors That Influence Their Adoption. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 84 (1):33 - 45.
Muel Kaptein (2004). Business Codes of Multinational Firms: What Do They Say? Journal of Business Ethics 50 (1):13-31.
Janet S. Adams, Armen Tashchian & Ted H. Shore (2001). Codes of Ethics as Signals for Ethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 29 (3):199 - 211.
Hong-zen Wang (2005). Asian Transnational Corporations and Labor Rights: Vietnamese Trade Unions in Taiwan-Invested Companies. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 56 (1):43 - 53.
Thomas R. Wotruba, Lawrence B. Chonko & Terry W. Loe (2001). The Impact of Ethics Code Familiarity on Manager Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 33 (1):59 - 69.
Mark S. Schwartz (2002). A Code of Ethics for Corporatecode of Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 41 (1-2):27 - 43.
Brendan O'Dwyer & Grainne Madden (2006). Ethical Codes of Conduct in Irish Companies: A Survey of Code Content and Enforcement Procedures. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 63 (3):217 - 236.
Brendan O’Dwyer & Grainne Madden (2006). Ethical Codes of Conduct in Irish Companies: A Survey of Code Content and Enforcement Procedures. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 63 (3):217 - 236.
Robin S. Snell & Neil C. Herndon (2004). Hong Kong's Code of Ethics Initiative: Some Differences Between Theory and Practice. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 51 (1):75-89.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #221,213 of 1,018,154 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?