David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (4):371-386 (2010)
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) called for a ban on mulesing in the Australian sheep industry in 2004. Mulesing is a surgical procedure that removes wool-bearing skin from the tail and breech area of sheep in order to prevent flystrike (cutaneous myiasis). Flystrike occurs when flies lay their eggs in soiled areas of wool on the sheep and can be fatal for the sheep host. PETA claimed that mulesing subjects sheep to unnecessary pain and suffering and took action against the Australian wool industry that resulted in a number of international clothing retailers choosing not to use Australian wool. Although the Australian sheep industry agreed to phase out mulesing in 2010, there is some uncertainty as to whether this deadline will be achieved. The changing social ethic towards animal welfare suggests that the way the Australian sheep industry manages the phase out of mulesing in 2010 is vital to its future survival and success. It is likely that if mulesing does not cease in 2010 there will be a negative market reaction to Australian wool and the risk of legislation to ban mulesing. To avoid losing control of its animal welfare strategy, the Australian sheep industry should ensure that mulesing is phased out in 2010 and endorse the animal welfare ethic underpinning this change. The industry should also educate farmers and other industry stakeholders in how the changing social ethic for animal welfare can create new market opportunities for wool
|Keywords||Animal welfare Ethics Australia Flystrike Sheep Mulesing|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gavrell Ortiz & Sara Elizabeth (2004). Beyond Welfare: Animal Integrity, Animal Dignity, and Genetic Engineering. Ethics and the Environment 9 (1):94-120.
Kirsten Schmidt (2011). Concepts of Animal Welfare in Relation to Positions in Animal Ethics. Acta Biotheoretica 59 (2):153-171.
I. Anna S. Olsson, Christian Gamborg & Peter Sandøe (2006). Taking Ethics Into Account in Farm Animal Breeding: What Can the Breeding Companies Achieve? [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (1):37-46.
Temple Grandin (ed.) (2010). Improving Animal Welfare: A Practical Approach. Cab International.
David J. Mellor (2009). The Sciences of Animal Welfare. Wiley-Blackwell.
Michael C. Morris (2003). Issues Associated with Research on Sheep Parasite Control in New Zealand – a Descriptive Ethic. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (2):187-207.
Nicholas Purcell (1988). Sheep Farming in Roman Italy Joan M. Frayn: Sheep-Rearing and the Wool Trade in Italy During the Roman Period. (ARCA Classical and Medieval Texts, Papers and Monographs, 15.) Pp. 208; 8 Pp. Of Plates. Liverpool: Francis Cairns, 1984. £20. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 38 (01):96-99.
Michael C. Morris (2000). Ethical Issues Associated with Sheep Fly Strike Research, Prevention, and Control. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (3-4):205-217.
Dominique Blache A. Lee (forthcoming). Farmer's Response to Societal Concerns About Farm Animal Welfare: The Case of Mulesing. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.
Alexandra Wells, Joanne Sneddon, Julie Lee & Dominique Blache (2011). Farmer's Response to Societal Concerns About Farm Animal Welfare: The Case of Mulesing. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (6):645-658.
Added to index2009-11-07
Total downloads20 ( #70,378 of 1,006,443 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,735 of 1,006,443 )
How can I increase my downloads?