Graduate studies at Western
Continental Philosophy Review 43 (3):407-437 (2010)
|Abstract||This article offers a new interpretation of Adorno’s new categorical imperative : it suggests that the new imperative is an important element of Adorno’s moral philosophy and at the same time runs counter to some of its essential features. It is suggested that Adorno’s moral philosophy leads to two aporiae, which create an impasse that the new categorical imperative attempts to circumvent. The first aporia results from the tension between Adorno’s acknowledgement that praxis is an essential part of moral philosophy, and his view according to which existing social conditions make it impossible for moral knowledge to be translated into right action. The second aporia results from the tension between the uncompromising sensitivity to suffering that underlies Adorno’s moral thought, and his analysis of the culture industry mechanisms which turn people into happy, satisfied customers—an incompatibility which threatens to pull the rug out from under Adorno’s moral philosophy. My interpretation of the new categorical imperative focuses on two characteristics it inherits from the old, Kantian one—self-evidence and unconditionality—in order to present the new imperative as a response to these two aporiae.|
|Keywords||Adorno Kant New categorical imperative Auschwitz Critical theory Culture industry Experience|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
J. M. Bernstein (2001). Adorno: Disenchantment and Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Nance (2012). Kantian Right and the Categorical Imperative: Response to Willaschek. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (4):541-556.
Philip J. Kain (2007). Eternal Recurrence and the Categorical Imperative. Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (1):105-116.
Oliver Sensen (2011). Kant's Conception of Inner Value. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (2):262-280.
James Scott Johnston (2006). The Education of the Categorical Imperative. Studies in Philosophy and Education 25 (5-6):385-402.
Marcus Arvan (2012). Unifying the Categorical Imperative. Southwest Philosophical Review 28 (1):217-225.
Xiaomei Yang (2006). Categorical Imperatives, Moral Requirements, and Moral Motivation. Metaphilosophy 37 (1):112–129.
Joel J. Kupperman (2002). A Messy Derivation of the Categorical Imperative. Philosophy 77 (4):485-502.
D. M. Levin (2001). The Embodiment of the Categorical Imperative: Kafka, Foucault, Benjamin, Adorno and Levinas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (4):1-20.
Theodor W. Adorno (2003). Can One Live After Auschwitz?: A Philosophical Reader. Stanford University Press.
Robert Audi (2001). A Kantian Intuitionism. Mind 110 (439):601-635.
Marcus Willaschek (2009). Right and Coercion: Can Kant's Conception of Right Be Derived From His Moral Theory? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (1):49 – 70.
Stephen P. Engstrom (2009). The Form of Practical Knowledge: A Study of the Categorical Imperative. Harvard University Press.
Marcus Schulzke (2012). Kant's Categorical Imperative, the Value of Respect, and the Treatment of Women. Journal of Military Ethics 11 (1):26-41.
Added to index2010-11-27
Total downloads39 ( #34,832 of 740,432 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,338 of 740,432 )
How can I increase my downloads?